From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] sched/rt: Add early exit on balance path
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:17:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828104018.681741017@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20260828101659.812011872@infradead.org
Add/make consistent an early exit on the balance_{rt,dl}() path. When there are
no pushable tasks, there is no point in taking the rq lock and all that jazz.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 10 +++-------
kernel/sched/rt.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -3250,17 +3250,13 @@ static void pull_dl_task(struct rq *this
src_rq->dl.earliest_dl.next))
continue;
+ if (!has_pushable_dl_tasks(src_rq))
+ continue;
+
/* Might drop this_rq->lock */
push_task = NULL;
double_lock_balance(this_rq, src_rq);
- /*
- * If there are no more pullable tasks on the
- * rq, we're done with it.
- */
- if (src_rq->dl.dl_nr_running <= 1)
- goto skip;
-
p = pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(src_rq, this_cpu);
/*
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -2303,6 +2303,9 @@ static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this
this_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)
continue;
+ if (!has_pushable_tasks(src_rq))
+ continue;
+
/*
* We can potentially drop this_rq's lock in
* double_lock_balance, and another CPU could
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 10:16 [PATCH 0/7] sched: core-sched fixes and balancing Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 10:17 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched/core: Fix pick_next_task() self recursion Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-03 11:13 ` Aaron Lu
2026-09-25 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 10:17 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched/core: Simplify/fix time updates Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-02 5:38 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-02 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 10:17 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched/core: Allow newidle for core-sched Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-08-28 10:17 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched/fair: Reflow pick_task_fair() / newidle Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 10:17 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched/fair: Push sched_balance_newidle() unlock down Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28 10:17 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched: Remove sched_class::balance() Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01 23:47 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828104018.681741017@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.