From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2468A31716B for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 02:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787971434; cv=none; b=XmAEgwbOT1BZpjytLGb/t/yao0IyIGG8l/xNaL7ujw49944998d0v7t1jw37NkMkCNa4LJx+Yd+iNZV9RCTqg8BwbD8Ju/PBXXvjyvSbRjRHt5y2wIe8H9jbmtRjJwhpCjMydvb2Dzg9xdR/F8gs5+YjSWJfoAyO2bUD0dlYMF8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787971434; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uY2YqK1okqtoQzvP7+OHrgMi5OM+JzBwVNxBK/mALWY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-Id; b=lEcxXwka5f59uiqlF7eFUKjyKw/AlIgfzAfezGQArkicJL3ylEPvVdRzRNQUz4sFC7yJpG49APWmuwz8bVczs8ZklUIHJDXAjicxc5KEGOWSgZ842nCNFvemgTT1UA0Y33H6EcWbO0CfP0tZPtbJhLyUp446dIIetSfjdxyjL+w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=JOoC1pHs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="JOoC1pHs" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC8AA1F000E9; Sat, 29 Aug 2026 02:43:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1787971432; bh=ruhaXgLo2rUkOJ7uiq0ZmCdPx0QC5Ukp8KhA71pqQBI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=JOoC1pHsMDjv82diUriBIMeO+1Kghb8JRRtbgSmDLav9hTaEAM6WYFGtRtDGFx2CF CgduY2Jf4LBdqvWHS/iPZDHtIcnyk1TbwWfwGGRLfcZCQBwCeRgwBcbOGB/uPOwtgG aQ9sFdGLhjAbAkyLTd1FBk8kjwynIiWszVkMfOy4= Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 19:43:52 -0700 To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,tjmercier@google.com,roman.gushchin@linux.dev,muchun.song@linux.dev,mhocko@suse.com,ljs@kernel.org,kasong@tencent.com,hannes@cmpxchg.org,david@kernel.org,baohua@kernel.org,axelrasmussen@google.com,shakeel.butt@linux.dev,akpm@linux-foundation.org From: Andrew Morton Subject: + memcg-remove-the-soft-limit-reclaim-tracepoints.patch added to mm-new branch Message-Id: <20260829024352.BC8AA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: The patch titled Subject: memcg: remove the soft limit reclaim tracepoints has been added to the -mm mm-new branch. Its filename is memcg-remove-the-soft-limit-reclaim-tracepoints.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/memcg-remove-the-soft-limit-reclaim-tracepoints.patch This patch will later appear in the mm-new branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm Note, mm-new is a provisional staging ground for work-in-progress patches, and acceptance into mm-new is a notification for others take notice and to finish up reviews. Please do not hesitate to respond to review feedback and post updated versions to replace or incrementally fixup patches in mm-new. The mm-new branch of mm.git is not included in linux-next If a few days of testing in mm-new is successful, the patch will me moved into mm.git's mm-unstable branch, which is included in linux-next Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm and is updated there most days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Shakeel Butt Subject: memcg: remove the soft limit reclaim tracepoints Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:31:58 -0700 mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin and mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end were only emitted by mem_cgroup_shrink_node(), which is gone, so they can never fire again. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260811203203.3456029-5-shakeel.butt@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt Acked-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) Cc: Axel Rasmussen Cc: Barry Song Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Kairui Song Cc: Muchun Song Cc: Roman Gushchin Cc: T.J. Mercier Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h~memcg-remove-the-soft-limit-reclaim-tracepoints +++ a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h @@ -214,13 +214,6 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_be TP_ARGS(gfp_flags, order, memcg) ); - -DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_begin, - - TP_PROTO(gfp_t gfp_flags, int order, struct mem_cgroup *memcg), - - TP_ARGS(gfp_flags, order, memcg) -); #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, @@ -258,13 +251,6 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_en TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed, struct mem_cgroup *memcg), - TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed, memcg) -); - -DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end, - - TP_PROTO(unsigned long nr_reclaimed, struct mem_cgroup *memcg), - TP_ARGS(nr_reclaimed, memcg) ); #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */ _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from shakeel.butt@linux.dev are memcg-clear-flushing_cached_charge-on-cpu-offline.patch memcg-trim-the-per-cpu-charge-stock-instead-of-draining-it.patch memcg-remove-v1-soft-limit-reclaim.patch memcg-remove-mem_cgroup_shrink_node.patch memcg-remove-the-soft-limit-reclaim-tracepoints.patch memcg-remove-the-soft-limit-rbtree.patch memcg-remove-lru_gen_soft_reclaim.patch memcg-remove-the-per-node-soft-limit-tree-fields.patch memcg-remove-mem_cgroup-soft_limit.patch memcg-simplify-v1-event-ratelimiting.patch