From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: steven@liquorix.net
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [zen:7.2/bbr3 1/2] net/ipv4/tcp_bbr3.c:2051:17: warning: variable 'round_delivered' set but not used
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 08:59:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202608290804.uQTc6zeR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://github.com/zen-kernel/zen-kernel 7.2/bbr3
head: f04474ac60538e992f6c6cf854e0fda08632e2da
commit: f7f00444a9ad2284192bfa6aaef7ce9be2d43388 [1/2] tcp/bbr3: add BBRv3 congestion control
config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260829/202608290804.uQTc6zeR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260829/202608290804.uQTc6zeR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608290804.uQTc6zeR-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
net/ipv4/tcp_bbr3.c: In function 'bbr_main':
>> net/ipv4/tcp_bbr3.c:2051:17: warning: variable 'round_delivered' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable=]
2051 | u32 bw, round_delivered;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/round_delivered +2051 net/ipv4/tcp_bbr3.c
2043
2044 __bpf_kfunc static void bbr_main(struct sock *sk, u32 ack, int flag,
2045 const struct rate_sample *rs)
2046 {
2047 struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
2048 struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk);
2049 struct bbr_context ctx = { 0 };
2050 bool update_model = true;
> 2051 u32 bw, round_delivered;
2052 int ce_ratio = -1;
2053
2054 round_delivered = bbr_update_round_start(sk, rs, &ctx);
2055 if (bbr->round_start) {
2056 bbr->rounds_since_probe =
2057 min_t(s32, bbr->rounds_since_probe + 1, 0xFF);
2058 ce_ratio = bbr_update_ecn_alpha(sk);
2059 }
2060 bbr_plb(sk, rs, ce_ratio);
2061
2062 bbr->ecn_in_round |= (bbr->ecn_eligible && rs->is_ece);
2063 bbr_calculate_bw_sample(sk, rs, &ctx);
2064 bbr_update_latest_delivery_signals(sk, rs, &ctx);
2065
2066 if (bbr_run_fast_path(sk, &update_model, rs, &ctx))
2067 goto out;
2068
2069 if (update_model)
2070 bbr_update_model(sk, rs, &ctx);
2071
2072 bbr_update_gains(sk);
2073 bw = bbr_bw(sk);
2074 bbr_set_pacing_rate(sk, bw, bbr->pacing_gain);
2075 bbr_set_cwnd(sk, rs, rs->acked_sacked, bw, bbr->cwnd_gain,
2076 tcp_snd_cwnd(tp), &ctx);
2077 bbr_bound_cwnd_for_inflight_model(sk);
2078
2079 out:
2080 bbr_advance_latest_delivery_signals(sk, rs, &ctx);
2081 bbr->prev_ca_state = inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ca_state;
2082 bbr->loss_in_cycle |= rs->lost > 0;
2083 bbr->ecn_in_cycle |= rs->delivered_ce > 0;
2084 }
2085
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2026-08-29 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202608290804.uQTc6zeR-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=steven@liquorix.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.