From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B20632 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788063905; cv=none; b=Qr63atx78zJe1EpC0gePltGiOA3FMc180FrcOsc9/nLj+6fypSHeSboPKbQ96vtjyVvK83Q5c3tvjzxFE84go3pwOO48uruAoN/rh7LaLWKa6wsLNU4NJ/xigEcJmDll58yrwkZobP7UL5U1X+kBEl1fOORY/AyfKdIIPMnd8JM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788063905; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u2d2H54FmwEQLqrAH2pHq4vBpF0rGR2mFhBuqJrpvvQ=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=CL/3kKs2ohzS4mqrmmLMbMIneDFS9DhXNcuPvw0dJTUkQo0OtiJ9lij50ZGWwNkE0It52a42Fi2yPDjj3nqpIWC8JG751T5QPv6FAp2K6jmkN28WOCSQLxJBgU/lRqTx71RdJ51ztxF6xj0nMfZnOC2nWw4FoevIkmuonHmjkHI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ajRB6zXW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ajRB6zXW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B5511F000E9; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:25:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788063903; bh=ddEVq6c05SAzvxf5AxrKcrwKyh8FhnW/4yIIlDNUIbM=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ajRB6zXW2nd6GHA0Xr7Ug3eWv0eEyw9mso4HjpxUamZvCiXFm+Zj+ROZecL2TLzry h5QzHTwBkYUT5rQnNFKWFkITWfBPbYm4PElG8+jNrXu435r9VJU4JSg1rWU5Y8YeZ2 RJYeMiJSOM2xYGZWQT5xJc0y3q8qjHs1sUwq3rwTFyQDvHmIJqsMRVrNQC54qQhtef 7izLzZaB67rr6FPF3BcrdUOJfnjq0U5G++Z84Ea4tmy2GVsBg3TDZxmtts0FUkhwmv /wFo4kFA16nXn4gMIRTQsCPbX6DJDayLELrly6VOJmzLddqR55YGTNIstHDzAVo4+O ltMwuO9tNJaCA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] ntfs: Remove redundant FGP_NOFS from ntfs_wof_collect_dest() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: =?utf-8?b?TWF0dGhldyBXaWxjb3ggKE9yYWNsZSk=?= Cc: "Jeff Layton" , tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Chuck Lever" , "Anna Schumaker" In-Reply-To: <20260830041901.2668-7-willy@infradead.org> References: <20260830041901.2668-1-willy@infradead.org> <20260830041901.2668-7-willy@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:25:03 +0000 Message-Id: <20260830042503.8B5511F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The flags already include FGP_NOWAIT which prohibits all reclaim, not > just reclaiming from the filesystem. Use mapping_gfp_mask() instead of > GFP_NOFS as this will preserve flags like GFP_MOVABLE. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260830041901.2668= -1-willy@infradead.org?part=3D6