From: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com>
To: baohua@kernel.org
Cc: willy@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com,
tz2294@columbia.edu, jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org,
qiwenjie@xiaomi.com, qwjhust@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: filemap: retain mapped dropbehind folios
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:13:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830165401.1788080041-1-qwjhust@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4wpUBOXKd8aGNz76U+87bwDUXZZFSW2UhNcq4qpjVvggQ@mail.gmail.com>
Yes. The current path removes the folio from the page cache, so a later
mmap access can incur both another fault and I/O. I should have stated
that explicitly.
For fault-around neighbors, folio_mapped() cannot distinguish the faulting
page from a speculative neighbor. This patch takes the conservative policy
that an installed PTE represents a competing cache user and wins over the
writer's RWF_DONTCACHE hint. It can therefore retain a speculative neighbor
which is never accessed. Distinguishing those cases seems to require
fault-around to preserve the faulting folio while not mapping, or later
dropping, dropbehind neighbors. I think that should be considered as a
separate follow-up.
For folio_launder(), filemap_end_dropbehind() holds the folio lock and returns
if the folio is dirty or under writeback before calling
folio_unmap_invalidate(). folio_launder() also immediately returns for a
clean folio. I do not see how nfs_launder_folio() is reached from this
completion path unless the locked, unmapped folio can become dirty between
those checks. Is there a path I am missing?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 14:29 [PATCH] mm: filemap: tighten dropbehind completion context check Wenjie Qi
2026-08-20 14:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-08-21 1:23 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-21 3:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-08-24 13:34 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-29 1:10 ` Andrew Morton
2026-08-29 12:13 ` Wenjie Qi
2026-08-30 8:45 ` Barry Song
2026-08-29 12:30 ` [PATCH v2] mm: filemap: retain mapped dropbehind folios Wenjie Qi
2026-08-29 14:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-08-29 15:53 ` Tal Zussman
2026-08-29 16:09 ` Tal Zussman
2026-08-29 17:36 ` [PATCH v3] " Wenjie Qi
2026-08-29 18:16 ` Andrew Morton
2026-08-30 3:25 ` [PATCH v4] " Wenjie Qi
2026-08-30 8:35 ` Barry Song
2026-08-30 9:13 ` Wenjie Qi [this message]
2026-08-30 9:31 ` Barry Song
2026-08-30 11:58 ` Tal Zussman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830165401.1788080041-1-qwjhust@gmail.com \
--to=qwjhust@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=qiwenjie@xiaomi.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.