From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiaxing Hu" <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 11/14] accel/rocket: select the per-core clock and reset counts from match data
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:04:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831090409.2DE9A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831081956.84871-12-gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Missing NULL check for the return value of of_device_get_match_data(), leading to a guaranteed kernel panic on manual sysfs bind.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The driver tracks cores in an array using `num_cores` as both the array length and the probe index, causing resource leaks and array slot overwrites on out-of-order unbinds.
- [High] Devres memory leak of `struct rocket_device` and its children on probe deferral and manual unbind.
--
commit d68f29f9366dd1f885e0585ee67c1b358bda44b6
Author: Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
accel/rocket: select the per-core clock and reset counts from match data
This patch introduces a soc_data structure to provide per-SoC clock and
reset counts from the device match data. This enables supporting the
RK3576, which has different counts compared to the RK3588.
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> index 5dd260bacbff6..b202d15816a39 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int rocket_core_init(struct rocket_core *core)
>
> core->resets[0].id = "srst_a";
> core->resets[1].id = "srst_h";
> - err = devm_reset_control_bulk_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(core->resets),
> + err = devm_reset_control_bulk_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, core->soc->num_resets,
> core->resets);
[Severity: High]
Does this code crash with a NULL pointer dereference if a user with root
privileges force-binds the driver to a device using the sysfs bind interface?
The sysfs interface bypasses the device tree match, causing
of_device_get_match_data() (called in rocket_probe()) to return NULL, which
is then unconditionally dereferenced here as core->soc->num_resets.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> index 8bbbce594883e..6e7dc91c5faac 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ static int rocket_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> rdev->cores[core].rdev = rdev;
> rdev->cores[core].dev = &pdev->dev;
> + rdev->cores[core].soc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> rdev->cores[core].index = core;
>
> rdev->num_cores++;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does decrementing rdev->num_cores during
an out-of-order unbind in rocket_remove() leak resources and corrupt memory?
If a system has multiple cores (e.g., RK3588 has 3 RKNN cores) and a user
manually unbinds a lower-indexed core via sysfs before a higher-indexed
core, rdev->num_cores is decremented.
When the higher-indexed core is later unbound, find_core_for_dev() fails to
find it because the search space core < rdev->num_cores shrank, skipping
its teardown. A subsequent bind will then overwrite the active core's slot
at rdev->cores[rdev->num_cores].
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does probe deferral or manual unbind
permanently leak the struct rocket_device and its children?
During the first core probe, rocket_device_init() allocates rdev using
devm_drm_dev_alloc() tied to the global drm_dev.
If the core probe subsequently fails (e.g., -EPROBE_DEFER) or is manually
unbound, rocket_device_fini() unregisters the DRM device and rdev is set to
NULL. However, the devres allocations remain bound to the long-lived drm_dev
and persist indefinitely, leaking memory on every cycle.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831081956.84871-1-gahing@gahingwoo.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 8:19 [PATCH v11 00/14] accel/rocket: RK3576 NPU (RKNN) enablement Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 01/14] accel/rocket: request the core clocks by name Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 02/14] accel/rocket: take the completion register writes under job_lock Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 03/14] accel/rocket: wait for a running IRQ handler before resetting a core Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 04/14] accel/rocket: let the core suspend after a reset Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 05/14] accel/rocket: factor the completion tail out of the IRQ handler Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip, rk3576-rknn-core Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3576-rknn-core Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 07/14] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: allow resets in a power domain node Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 08/14] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: describe the RK3576 NPU MMU Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 09/14] pmdomain/rockchip: add optional per-domain power-on settle delay Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 10/14] pmdomain/rockchip: cycle optional power-domain resets on power-on Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 9:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 11/14] accel/rocket: select the per-core clock and reset counts from match data Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 9:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 12/14] accel/rocket: add RK3576 NPU (RKNN) support Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 9:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576: add NPU (RKNN) nodes Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 9:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 8:19 ` [PATCH v11 14/14] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3576-rock-4d: enable NPU Jiaxing Hu
2026-08-31 8:19 ` Jiaxing Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831090409.2DE9A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.