From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421833A9871 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 21:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788211403; cv=none; b=G/wyt9MvLcTcr3sYlox+J61gIq6KGabFYlvPPnFUcpacn7H2dGZAlp083BPddrV/91glcm5U+wdtJi5tFi1T0AxEjNfXJnOsxC9T0Gg57/SMrNplsja7APzi4Fedt9Z3cyYiO7jU6OBpmS1ef8ibWDUlLhBXmz/sdMUjY8fWZKY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788211403; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VYZE0nAcvprEH93zh62ikZlyk6t3BMK2x/zxTmmmGjw=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=HVGnhNbjcp7r3LfCNxPuekO83gTSYGvBPjXYDu/LZp74wf59PMcsONzSw/moV1mqvwanxPREC17rAZapsecNn3tvlAwYWrYAE7kBOZ+NcVMqv6g/rQwTjbJir8+a6qB3ml3DUcT1tdfiLgspE6RtTCKQlgyCffJvk4x5GjwZyuE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=i936lf1Y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i936lf1Y" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B18601F00A3D; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 21:23:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788211401; bh=VYZE0nAcvprEH93zh62ikZlyk6t3BMK2x/zxTmmmGjw=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=i936lf1YeKog+mTkCLyvZDR0ZK3Gey8ESwsXZtz+sj+hkp/W5p92rp+z5/sY3afMr rMWfw6EeT8eG9JjRE9aJP6kuG5Vv4sPD8iIeVFWbAE2i9aaB7E0GB8MXYQexonlWpx xlJB3UpFb7r8bRBFqLse8W+nW+Un9xeLFWLn/AvcKBcpcYvDCYG0yD5i97o4KzM0qe vizo4PUT/jGFQnuynnNMUJHva5bh9ZvtbUnddgdw+OAeE4qVPB0Kk6k/xIAHs5aMU6 JfRLQe+VUkictyaD968sskV81uxPVBn7I2Y+icRY59QuOM6/vatYnpllmwUMFVmlg5 1VZGRey0mIAcQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] ACPI: scan: Take PCI device enumeration into account directly Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <2497062.NG923GbCHz@rafael.j.wysocki> References: <3435655.aeNJFYEL58@rafael.j.wysocki> <2497062.NG923GbCHz@rafael.j.wysocki> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 21:23:21 +0000 Message-Id: <20260831212321.B18601F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >=20 > The ACPI companions of PCI devices are associated with the corresponding > PCI devices before being processed by acpi_scan_attach() and by the time > they are passed to attach_subtree(), the PCI devices associated with > them have been already enumerated and initialized (including power > management initialization). >=20 > Accordingly, it is not necessary or even useful to check their status in > attach_subtree(), so do not do that. >=20 > Fixes: 2c22e6520ac8 ("ACPI / scan: Use direct recurrence for device hiera= rchy walks") > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/3435655.aeNJFYEL58@= rafael.j.wysocki?part=3D7