From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alan Maguire" <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/18] bpftool: Add ability to dump LOC_PARAM, LOC_PROTO and LOCSEC
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 17:16:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901171616.DC2CA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901165757.801449-12-alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `vlen` for BTF_KIND_LOC_PROTO is incorrectly cast to `__u16`, causing implicit truncation for large vlen values.
- [Medium] The `BTF_LOC_PARAM_SIGNED` flag is ignored when printing values for `BTF_KIND_LOC_PARAM`, causing negative signed values to be printed as unsigned.
--
commit 979370a25e9a748392e761a4d7cd6d5cda14a0ed
Author: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
bpftool: Add ability to dump LOC_PARAM, LOC_PROTO and LOCSEC
This commit updates bpftool to support dumping the new BTF kinds
BTF_KIND_LOC_PARAM, BTF_KIND_LOC_PROTO, and BTF_KIND_LOCSEC. It adds raw and
JSON formatting support for these new types.
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
> index bca0a3982f09b..4d8991c99b484 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -415,6 +418,88 @@ static int dump_btf_type(const struct btf *btf, __u32 id,
[ ... ]
> + case BTF_KIND_LOC_PARAM: {
> + const struct btf_loc_param *p = btf_loc_param(t);
> + __u32 *v = (__u32 *)(p + 1);
> + __u32 i, vlen = btf_vlen(t);
[ ... ]
> + for (i = 0; i < vlen; i++, v++) {
> + if (json_output) {
> + jsonw_start_object(w);
> + jsonw_uint_field(w, "value", *v);
[Severity: Medium]
Since the BTF_LOC_PARAM_SIGNED flag can be set in p->flags, will this
jsonw_uint_field() unconditionally format negative signed values as large
unsigned integers?
> + jsonw_end_object(w);
> + } else {
> + printf("\n\t value=%u", *v);
[Severity: Medium]
Similarly for the plain-text output, does this ignore the BTF_LOC_PARAM_SIGNED
flag and print signed negative values as large unsigned integers?
> + }
> + }
> + if (json_output)
> + jsonw_end_array(w);
> + break;
> + }
> + case BTF_KIND_LOC_PROTO: {
> + __u32 *params = btf_loc_proto_params(t);
> + __u16 vlen = btf_vlen(t);
[Severity: Medium]
The vlen field in BTF types uses 24 bits. Does explicitly casting it to __u16
here silently drop the upper 8 bits?
For a BTF_KIND_LOC_PROTO type with a vlen greater than 65535, this could
truncate the output and display an incorrect number of parameters.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260901165757.801449-1-alan.maguire@oracle.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 16:57 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/18] Support inline functions in BTF Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/18] btf: Extend UAPI to support BTF location (inline site) info Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 17:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 22:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-11 19:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/18] libbpf: Add support for BTF kinds LOC[_PARAM|_PROTO|SEC] Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 22:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/18] libbpf: Support moving permuted BTF types into split BTF Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 18:14 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-10 9:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/18] selftests/bpf: Test helper support for BTF_KIND_LOC[_PARAM|_PROTO|SEC] Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/18] selftests/bpf: Add LOC_PARAM, LOC_PROTO, LOCSEC to field iter tests Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/18] selftests/bpf: Add LOC_PARAM, LOC_PROTO, LOCSEC to dedup split tests Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/18] selftests/bpf: BTF distill tests to ensure LOC[_PARAM|_PROTO] add to split BTF Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/18] selftests/bpf: Validate that btf__permute transfer works Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 17:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/18] bpftool: Handle multi-split BTF by supporting multiple base BTFs Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/18] bpftool: Document support for multi-split BTF Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/18] bpftool: Add ability to dump LOC_PARAM, LOC_PROTO and LOCSEC Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01 17:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-07 19:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/18] resolve_btfids: Extract inline BTF Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 13/18] kbuild: Add support for BTF inline information Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 14/18] btf: Make vmlinux, module inline info available in /sys/kernel/btf Alan Maguire
2026-09-07 19:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-07 19:50 ` Alan Maguire
2026-09-07 20:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 15/18] btf: Support CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_INLINE=m Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 16/18] btf: Relocate inline BTF for modules with distilled base BTF Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 17:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 17/18] selftests/bpf: Test BTF sysfs inline representations Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 17:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 18/18] selftests/bpf: Add a test verifying inline information Alan Maguire
2026-09-01 17:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 17:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901171616.DC2CA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.