From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A6AF3859FC for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 06:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788328973; cv=none; b=YjQseK44ziEfYf/AisQmWI7r1WTo7cijttCnab5ppwLagVjvHEyxQloKmqXpjnOJp73kLti8+Gdjq6o7IUrAE4pA1+Y+WKFtz6F0q+HjOKgbrQ5D+9dUFfUr8FwtPiN7Fim9BjucSIX3WINcJ435CZQCZnwFmSBtdIu6SdBOKcs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788328973; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0WCqVlfx7s71XpnwtmIqEjqrLqXCQwdTPlNsEJ8p/ag=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=u38rK4LI9cWOqd7yfw/51ua+tV2YlCknIggf3z/INTF/BYODKyAtQot/Bredu+3U+a4JBGIsKgRI5QsQxv2UBR4tVoVrIbllRi/v0LH4Z7l5nU8hHo08rEifuXdfDOkNgmA5ak4P+mAlPXQLneeku8blxWtKayEyVbOiLpG+Sv8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=A2dUTFIo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="A2dUTFIo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF5711F00A3A; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 06:02:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788328972; bh=vqr2JsarG/3Ap2qTym3RUaW2vY21bSnPJE1ufHWLIGY=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=A2dUTFIowlVxwQ8Seu10L/zGsYNwdRbAfxK3lkOGEnGImFnKUN1+utH7a7CsMVvOT yYRogUCxtoiYAi3XosnZqB+YTTbbmd+Ui8fPJK8/ITveB3I07aewCpZre1VYCKKx4+ ET8VFEoGivnLiaANJCMGWktmu/9fw4iVrK7cqKNXbaWlqINrOumgIRiHy1Vbc9lM7U gEisYuSqlawDFLQq+QKynSYX2trEDStzxuEpVnYU43ETt7UVz6PCMtIkT/37YHP8Jo +LBfYgyAEpKPeNR026KnOM7jDbpvoD/GOcKdwfHDYbTBU+JMvaMIiJNxHG4xKp00DP RCdzoTQdPI+4Q== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm/damon/core: validate number of probes in valid_probe_params() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "SJ Park" Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20260902054747.99370-5-sj@kernel.org> References: <20260902054747.99370-1-sj@kernel.org> <20260902054747.99370-5-sj@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 06:02:51 +0000 Message-Id: <20260902060251.DF5711F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Each DAMON context is allowed to have only up to DAMON_MAX_PROBES > probes. The central place for validating DAMON probe parameters, > damon_valid_probe_params(), is not validating the upper limit, though. > Do the validation. >=20 > Signed-off-by: SJ Park Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902054747.9937= 0-1-sj@kernel.org?part=3D4