From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 06:33:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902063310.116BD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902062153.31048-9-logang@deltatee.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Use-After-Free of `ioat_chan` and `ioatdma_device` structures on `ioat3_dma_probe` error path.
--
commit 5181bf41c6d9f7fa2de9a1b9a5e45637220e6c4f
Author: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device
This patch reorders the initialization sequence in ioat3_dma_probe(). It
moves the PCIe relaxed ordering configuration before dma_async_device_register()
to prevent leaving a dangling DMA device registration on the error path.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260707165906.249F41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ioat/init.c b/drivers/dma/ioat/init.c
> index 737496391109e..a57024c4b066e 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ioat/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ioat/init.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1194,6 +1185,15 @@ static int ioat3_dma_probe(struct ioatdma_device *ioat_dma, int dca)
> goto err_disable_interrupts;
> }
>
> + err = dma_async_device_register(&ioat_dma->dma_dev);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_disable_interrupts;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this error path lead
to a use-after-free if a shared interrupt fires?
If ioat3_dma_probe() fails here, it returns the error back to
ioat_pci_probe(), which immediately frees the device and its channels
manually:
drivers/dma/ioat/init.c:ioat_pci_probe() {
...
for (i = 0; i < IOAT_MAX_CHANS; i++)
kfree(device->idx[i]);
kfree(device);
...
}
However, the interrupts were previously registered using devm_request_irq()
in ioat_dma_setup_interrupts():
drivers/dma/ioat/init.c:ioat_dma_setup_interrupts() {
...
err = devm_request_irq(dev, pdev->irq, ioat_dma_do_interrupt,
IRQF_SHARED, "ioat-intx", ioat_dma);
...
}
Because devm managed resources are not cleaned up until the callbacks run
after the probe function returns, the IRQ handler remains active during
this window.
If a shared interrupt or pending MSI/MSI-X fires before devres cleans up
the IRQ, will the handler dereference the already-freed ioatdma_device and
ioat_chan structures?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902062153.31048-1-logang@deltatee.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 6:21 [PATCH v6 00/10] dmaengine: miscellaneous fixes for ioat, switchtec_dma and plx_dma Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix double-free in switchtec_dma_free_desc() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix resource leak in alloc_chan_resources Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix channel leak on registration failure Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: make switchtec_dma_chans_release() void Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix chan_status_irq cleanup on create() error Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: disable channels before freeing on registration failure Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix use-after-free of swdma_dev in remove() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] dmaengine: ioat: use sysfs_emit() in per-channel sysfs show() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 6:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] dmaengine: plx_dma: fix NULL pointer deref in plx_dma_isr() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-02 6:40 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902063310.116BD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.