From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 347AA42122E; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 12:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788351895; cv=none; b=KqyFhR82tTfqrWC320rCsAXuaDDS+zYPueQEdxOCgeyEpJfeyjMW2j1EX+g2Tbg9lG/nN72hFq691bVOKdbPBI137+j2/r4pMkJteHWKGnT/sc5k+58YeanWhR9RTbNjB45BjWOyuyIMo5tCnZM3trahJaBuJGLZ/YaawGR5exY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788351895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ej4p0qa74jnkFOGU5Qewu1Sjfz4nOHxMv+LHJ8EzW14=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=s0JUJlcNIyBEPIg4j+aSrfnRQfKwsuw+Vf9x+TP4Ttpee1g0NRhzlwbVk8dla8s/8gjm+Nvmh6MCTlr9iUDBTPW4gaelcFBxIFge5QbGFQGAG0z0Oqkx3/OIsV4kSxYJlaBwvtT9SGEOMOUMpUvwnHGLC7ZnAOpE23DwWbsIUNc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=goodmis.org header.i=@goodmis.org header.b=ppkuMep4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=goodmis.org header.i=@goodmis.org header.b="ppkuMep4" Received: from omf11.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BD3A2D70; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 12:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2E8092002C; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 12:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 08:25:50 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Lee Jones Cc: Greg KH , Vincent Donnefort , stable@vger.kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: STABLE REQ: [PATCH v5 06/10] tracing: Fix subbuf resize races with trace_pipe_raw readers Message-ID: <20260902082550.4644fe91@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20260902082141.00583dfc@gandalf.local.home> References: <20260813131152.3589632-1-vdonnefort@google.com> <20260813131152.3589632-7-vdonnefort@google.com> <20260901123444.GA1350131@google.com> <20260901094656.487b278f@gandalf.local.home> <20260902082717.GM2943942@google.com> <2026090230-entryway-acquaint-d12e@gregkh> <20260902095744.GN2943942@google.com> <2026090221-riverbank-overlay-704c@gregkh> <20260902115944.GS2943942@google.com> <20260902082141.00583dfc@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2E8092002C X-Stat-Signature: 1px7os6pxgffm8pa9bxe3ascm1amsno7 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX18VmYHVcSK8qCijeiH9Xv0m2nzQycbwqjw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=goodmis.org; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim1; bh=ej4p0qa74jnkFOGU5Qewu1Sjfz4nOHxMv+LHJ8EzW14=; b=ppkuMep46KNbWgKUxRUeLSRe++AJdx/skL1WVV5WPZZP3EDCjUTyTLrNV5yWEQOGSzHXgxep65E+HiZ7Ss2CioAzIgBsxmXe+x/LyT0+qyRaWMlVlpG2f9nRN0k0Nhp6ZjM7qrAIG6pvmrI/JxNo1dASC8FGVg5f1qxxxaw3t7E= X-HE-Tag: 1788351890-601368 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX19pZWjB+gdQpmznQcfOz7UQ49dQknVK5f+wC6C4T3Z6LhYbWrN5JKQSe9fUXtSImFvjMyQlfyq8cjhI2arASpgeSTLWHGogJQfjneOoVTTR2CePGbzN5ihZHrek11h1KHffJseO75ZuudkwEAG4rlOWUsmCgEHKX4eO1V7UZzDg11JN+ESz7N2qQw0GPWWwhPNI/MzLa73ve97IQnzzcGKliUkg6H7ir11538+tq3fJdM+Q4gbWZBFUC6LIFbaa0V5xvKggnoEs2HlzPcaPUkse57T8RC165J6jgS4PcO6nKHusYlGpa4rC/4o5PsVCQmdfJLJoc6KaI+oa3nxsnDE7e1ws+Shg/IPLaia6uzaXS+NF+NdP/XrS On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 08:21:41 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > There's even been times that I *removed* a Cc to stable because I did not > think it was worth the backport. Of course, I still keep the Fixes tag, > which means it will likely be backported anyway. But that's up to the > stable maintainers to decide ;-) The big difference between a commit with the Fixes tag and a Cc to stable verses one with the Fixes tag without the Cc stable, is that the one with Cc stable will give me a "FAILED" message if it fails to apply. One with just the Fixes tag and no Cc stable, will not generate that message to me if it doesn't apply back to the version with the Fixes commit sha. I do like to know what I marked as stable and fails to apply. Unfortunately I don't have the time to go fix them. But I keep them in a mail folder in case I need to do it one day. -- Steve