All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] mm/damon/sysfs: remove probes number validation
Date: Wed,  2 Sep 2026 07:37:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902143706.88115-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902140714.4023700-1-kunwu.chan@linux.dev>

On Wed,  2 Sep 2026 22:07:13 +0800 Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue,  1 Sep 2026 22:47:38 -0700 SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
[...]
> I was wondering whether DAMON_MAX_PROBES is purely a core invariant
> or also an interface constraint.

Thank you for reviewing my patch and raising this question!

> 
> With this change, sysfs allows nr_probes larger than
> DAMON_MAX_PROBES and damon_sysfs_probes_add_dirs() will start creating
> probe objects before the configuration is later rejected by
> damon_valid_probe_params().
> 
> Since nr_probes directly controls the number of sysfs objects created,
> do we still want to keep an early check here?
> 
> I agree that the core validation is required for non-sysfs callers,
> but I am not sure whether this particular limit should be duplicated
> at the sysfs layer.

I agree the user experience may be not that good.

In my humble opinion, however, keeping code simplicity is more important than
the user experience here.  After all, DAMON_SYSFS is recommended to be used by
another high level tools like DAMON user-space tool (damo) rather than human
fingers.  The user-space tools like damo can do the early check.

Please feel free to let me know if you have any other opinions or questions.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02  5:47 [PATCH 00/12] mm/damon: cleanup code, add test cases, and update guidances in docs SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 01/12] mm/damon/core: use damon_nr_samples_per_aggr() for max merge threshold SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  2:00   ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 02/12] mm/damon/core: remove debug messages SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  6:11     ` SJ Park
2026-09-02  6:14   ` SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 03/12] mm/damon/vaddr: remove a debug message SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  2:24   ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 04/12] mm/damon/core: validate number of probes in valid_probe_params() SJ Park
2026-09-02  6:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 15:32   ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 05/12] mm/damon/sysfs: remove probes number validation SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:07   ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 14:37     ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-09-02 15:33       ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 06/12] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: extend set_regions() test for error case SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 07/12] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test <=0 size damon_set_regions() inputs SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 08/12] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test overlapping ranges for set_regions() SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  3:04   ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 09/12] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test damon_nr_samples_per_aggr() SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 15:08   ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02 15:19     ` SJ Park
2026-09-02 15:49       ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-03  0:22         ` SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 10/12] selftests/damon/sysfs.sh: test hugepage_mem_bp quota goal SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  3:06   ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 11/12] Docs/mm/damon/maintainer-profile: update AI review for Sashiko replies SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  5:47 ` [PATCH 12/12] Docs/ABI/damon: recommend subsystem doc instead of admin-guide SJ Park
2026-09-02  5:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  3:09   ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-02  6:16 ` [PATCH 00/12] mm/damon: cleanup code, add test cases, and update guidances in docs SJ Park
2026-09-02 22:42 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260902143706.88115-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
    --cc=kunwu.chan@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.