From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tejas Upadhyay" <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V20 12/15] drm/xe/vram: Check disable_vram_page_offline policy in fault handler
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 16:48:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902164823.DD9C51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902145343.465686-29-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Unratelimited error logging in the VRAM address fault handler can cause dmesg flooding and DoS.
--
commit 5bfee849427fab2b54c95eec2934afe083fd4e87
Author: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
drm/xe/vram: Check disable_vram_page_offline policy in fault handler
This commit introduces a check in the VRAM address fault handler to verify the
disable_vram_page_offline policy. If enabled, it logs the corrupted address
and returns -EOPNOTSUPP so that RAS can report it without attempting to offline
the page.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> index 0ab92bc3c6998..00569c5279a83 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -906,6 +907,12 @@ int xe_ttm_vram_handle_addr_fault(struct xe_device *xe, u64 addr)
> vram_mgr = &vr->ttm;
> mm = &vram_mgr->mm;
>
> + if (xe->ras.disable_vram_page_offline) {
> + xe_err(xe, "0x%llx is reported as corrupted address by HW\n",
> + addr);
[Severity: Medium]
Since this page is intentionally kept online and not offlined, can a corrupted
VRAM page accessed in a tight loop by a userspace application, or polled
continuously by the hardware, cause a log flood here?
Could this use a rate-limited logging function to prevent a potential local
Denial of Service (DoS) from continuous dmesg writes, especially on systems
with serial consoles?
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> /* Reserve page at address */
> return xe_ttm_vram_reserve_page_at_addr(xe, addr - vr->dpa_base, vram_mgr, mm);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902145343.465686-17-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com?part=12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 14:53 [PATCH V20 00/15] Add memory page offlining support Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 01/15] drm/xe: Link VRAM object with gpu buddy Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 02/15] drm/xe: Link LRC BO and its execution queue with safe lifetime rules Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 03/15] drm/xe: Export xe_ttm_bo_purge() Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 04/15] drm/xe: Handle NULL resource and allow purging of VRAM pages Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 05/15] drm/xe/bo: Make xe_bo_is_user() public Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 06/15] drm/xe: Guard teardown paths against purged BOs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 15:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 17:52 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 07/15] drm/xe/vram: Extract buddy allocation and free helpers Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 08/15] drm/xe/vram: Add page offline data structures and lifecycle Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 09/15] drm/xe/vram: Add VRAM page offline fault handler Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 23:04 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 4:22 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 7:57 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 10/15] drm/xe/configfs: Add disable_vram_page_offline attribute Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 17:56 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 11/15] drm/xe/ras: Cache disable_vram_page_offline policy at init Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 12/15] drm/xe/vram: Check disable_vram_page_offline policy in fault handler Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 17:57 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 18:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 13/15] drm/xe: Expose bad VRAM pages via debugfs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 18:00 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 23:08 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 18:36 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 14/15] drm/xe/uapi: Expose ban reason in EXEC_QUEUE_GET_PROPERTY_BAN Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 17:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 23:12 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 15/15] drm/xe: Add fault-inject based VRAM page offline injection Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 17:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add memory page offlining support (rev24) Patchwork
2026-09-02 17:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-02 17:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-03 6:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902164823.DD9C51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.