From: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: consume the given iter directly instead of copying in csum_one_bio()
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 18:51:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902165137.3781696-2-neelx@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902165137.3781696-1-neelx@suse.com>
This is just a small cleanup to avoid copying the iter twice in async case.
We already have a copy csum_one_bio() can consume directly. No need to copy
again the second time.
In the sync case we can copy in the caller (as we did before dd57c78aec39
("btrfs: introduce btrfs_bio::async_csum")).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
index 581ca5653be9..5a5cffb18922 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
@@ -797,18 +797,16 @@ int btrfs_lookup_csums_bitmap(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
return ret;
}
-static void csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, struct bvec_iter *src)
+static void csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, struct bvec_iter *iter)
{
struct btrfs_inode *inode = bbio->inode;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums = bbio->sums;
- struct bvec_iter iter;
const u32 blocksize = fs_info->sectorsize;
int index = 0;
- for (iter = *src; iter.bi_size; bio_advance_iter(&bbio->bio, &iter, blocksize)) {
- btrfs_csum_one_bio_block(fs_info, &bbio->bio, &iter,
- sums->sums + index);
+ for (; iter->bi_size; bio_advance_iter(&bbio->bio, iter, blocksize)) {
+ btrfs_csum_one_bio_block(fs_info, &bbio->bio, iter, sums->sums + index);
index += fs_info->csum_size;
}
@@ -851,12 +849,14 @@ int btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, bool async)
btrfs_add_ordered_sum(ordered, sums);
if (!async) {
- csum_one_bio(bbio, &bbio->bio.bi_iter);
+ struct bvec_iter iter = bio->bi_iter;
+
+ csum_one_bio(bbio, &iter);
return 0;
}
init_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
bbio->async_csum = true;
- bbio->csum_saved_iter = bbio->bio.bi_iter;
+ bbio->csum_saved_iter = bio->bi_iter;
INIT_WORK(&bbio->csum_work, csum_one_bio_work);
schedule_work(&bbio->csum_work);
return 0;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 16:51 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: async checksumming cleanups Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 16:51 ` Daniel Vacek [this message]
2026-09-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: consume the given iter directly instead of copying in csum_one_bio() Qu Wenruo
2026-09-02 22:47 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-09-03 4:49 ` Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: use bio::remaining for async checksumming synchronization Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 22:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-09-02 22:20 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902165137.3781696-2-neelx@suse.com \
--to=neelx@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.