From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mukesh Ojha" <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/11] drm: malidp: Use devm_of_reserved_mem_device_init()
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 20:35:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902203550.304C21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902201640.2024648-6-mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Permanent CMA capacity leak due to clearing dev->cma_area before GEM objects are freed during device unbind.
--
commit a1f947cbe50ede0e9b650dcb9e31cc36cb85952d
Author: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
drm: malidp: Use devm_of_reserved_mem_device_init()
This commit simplifies the driver by transitioning to the devres-managed
devm_of_reserved_mem_device_init(), removing manual cleanup calls during
bind failures and unbind.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c
> index 23fa942ae4bbe..3e17513c31147 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c
> @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ static int malidp_bind(struct device *dev)
> return PTR_ERR(hwdev->pxlclk);
>
> /* Get the optional framebuffer memory resource */
> - ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev);
> + ret = devm_of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this devres conversion
preserve a pre-existing CMA memory capacity leak during device unbind?
In malidp_bind(), devm_drm_dev_alloc() is called before this initialization
function. Because devres actions execute in reverse order of allocation, the
cleanup action registered here will execute before the drm_dev_put() action.
When malidp_unbind() returns, the component framework immediately releases
the component's devres group, clearing dev->cma_area. Later, when the DRM
device is freed (either immediately or when userspace eventually closes its
file descriptors), drm_gem_object_free() calls dma_free_contiguous().
Because dev->cma_area is already NULL at that point, it bypasses
cma_release() and falls back to the buddy allocator, permanently leaking
the CMA region's bitmap capacity.
The previous code suffered from this exact same ordering issue since the
manual of_reserved_mem_device_release() call happened before drm_dev_put()
ran. Is there a way to adjust the cleanup order so the CMA area outlives
the GEM objects?
> if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
> return ret;
>
[ ... ]
> @@ -913,7 +912,6 @@ static void malidp_unbind(struct device *dev)
> else
> malidp_runtime_pm_suspend(dev);
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> - of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev);
> }
>
> static const struct component_master_ops malidp_master_ops = {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902201640.2024648-1-mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 20:16 [PATCH v2 0/11] drm: Use devm_of_reserved_mem_device_init() Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/11] drm: logicvc: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/11] drm: hdlcd: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/11] drm: pl111: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/11] drm: komeda: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/11] drm: malidp: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:35 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/11] drm: ingenic: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 7/11] drm: kmb: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 8/11] drm: sun4i: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 9/11] drm: xlnx: zynqmp_dpsub: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] drm: aspeed: " Mukesh Ojha
2026-09-02 20:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] drm: arcpgu: " Mukesh Ojha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902203550.304C21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.