All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf dso: Defer dropping the open list reference until after the lock
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 13:51:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903135150.1B0A81F00ADE@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903132251.237029-6-acme@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Failing to allocate a deferred put node leaks the reference handle and causes a memory leak of the DSO object.
--

commit a29267f86fa45a10095cc91a7c0350e522de6c4a
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

perf dso: Defer dropping the open list reference until after the lock

This patch addresses a deadlock and resource imbalance issue by deferring
the dropping of the DSO open list reference. It transfers the reference to a
deferred node during dso__list_del(), which is later drained by
dso__put_deferred() outside of the dso__data_open_lock.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.c b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
> index 42bfe30a3b518..a4b2361bc7420 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/dso.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -531,18 +531,79 @@ static void dso__list_add(struct dso *dso) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(_dso__data_o
>  	dso__data_open_cnt++;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef REFCNT_CHECKING
> +/*
> + * A deferred put: carries the reference taken by dso__list_add() for an
> + * entry removed from dso__data_open.  Dedicated nodes are used so that
> + * the dso_data's own open_entry node can be relinked by a concurrent
> + * dso__list_add() without corrupting this list or its reference.
> + */
> +struct dso_data_put {
> +	struct list_head entry;
> +	struct dso *dso;
> +};
> +static LIST_HEAD(dso__data_open_put);
> +#endif
> +
>  static void dso__list_del(struct dso *dso) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(_dso__data_open_lock)
>  {
> -	list_del_init(&dso__data(dso)->open_entry);
>  #ifdef REFCNT_CHECKING
> -	mutex_unlock(dso__data_open_lock());
> -	dso__put(dso__data(dso)->dso);
> -	mutex_lock(dso__data_open_lock());
> +	struct dso_data_put *put;
>  #endif
> +
> +	list_del_init(&dso__data(dso)->open_entry);
>  	WARN_ONCE(dso__data_open_cnt <= 0,
>  		  "DSO data fd counter out of bounds.");
>  	dso__data_open_cnt--;
> +#ifdef REFCNT_CHECKING
> +	/*
> +	 * The reference taken in dso__list_add() cannot be dropped while
> +	 * holding the open lock: dso__put() may call dso__data_close(),
> +	 * which takes dso__data_open_lock itself, deadlocking and leaving
> +	 * the list/counter state inconsistent for concurrent threads.
> +	 * Transfer the reference to a deferred node drained by
> +	 * dso__put_deferred() once the lock is released.
> +	 */
> +	put = zalloc(sizeof(*put));
> +
> +	if (put == NULL)
> +		return;

[Severity: Medium]
Does this early return cause a memory leak of the DSO object if zalloc fails?

During dso__list_del(), returning early without placing the deferred put node
onto dso__data_open_put abandons the reference in dso__data(dso)->dso. If the
DSO is subsequently added to the open list again, dso__list_add() could
overwrite this pointer with a new reference, permanently leaking the prior one
and preventing the DSO reference count from ever reaching 0.

> +
> +	put->dso = dso__data(dso)->dso;
> +	dso__data(dso)->dso = NULL;
> +	list_add_tail(&put->entry, &dso__data_open_put);
> +#endif
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260903132251.237029-1-acme@kernel.org?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 13:22 [PATCH v1 0/5] perf tools: Fix jitdump and dso handling Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-03 13:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf jitdump: Byte-swap debug entries via unaligned-safe accessors Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-03 13:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 13:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf genelf: Use unaligned-safe accessors for debug entries Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-03 13:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 13:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf jitdump: Free unwinding data even when eh_frame_hdr_size is zero Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-03 13:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 17:05   ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-03 13:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf jitdump: Size code_move event allocation with idr_size Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-03 13:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 13:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf dso: Defer dropping the open list reference until after the lock Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-03 13:51   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-03 16:40   ` Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260903135150.1B0A81F00ADE@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.