From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alexandru Elisei" <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 16/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 16:32:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903163250.3F3531F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903160623.315525-17-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] WARN_ON_ONCE is incorrectly called with a string literal instead of a boolean condition.
--
commit aa1092f112d707ae630c6edfaa06e1cf58da7524
Author: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context
This commit adds SPE registers to the VCPU context. It only traps the buffer
registers, allowing KVM to track the buffer enabled state for dirty page
logging and to sanitise writes to PMBLIMITR_EL1 based on exposed VM features.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c
> index 4426d614a9e0b..6a00a44c73edf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/spe.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -82,6 +83,34 @@ void kvm_spe_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> module_put(spe_pmu->pmu.module);
> }
>
> +bool kvm_spe_write_sysreg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg, u64 val)
> +{
> + switch (reg) {
> + case PMBLIMITR_EL1:
> + case PMBSR_EL1:
> + case PMBPTR_EL1:
> + __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, reg, val);
> + break;
> + default:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE("unexpected trap");
[Severity: Low]
Does this macro call miss a boolean condition? The WARN_ON_ONCE macro
expects a boolean expression, but it is being passed a string literal here.
While this functionally evaluates to true because the string decays into a
non-null pointer, could this be considered an API misuse? Perhaps this
should use WARN_ONCE(1, "unexpected trap") or WARN_ON_ONCE(1) instead when
an unexpected trapped SPE register access falls through to the default case
in kvm_spe_write_sysreg().
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +u64 kvm_spe_read_sysreg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg)
> +{
> + switch (reg) {
> + case PMBLIMITR_EL1:
> + case PMBSR_EL1:
> + case PMBPTR_EL1:
> + return __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> + default:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE("unexpected trap");
[Severity: Low]
Similarly, should this use WARN_ONCE(1, "unexpected trap") instead of
passing a string literal directly into WARN_ON_ONCE when an unexpected
trapped read falls through to the default case in kvm_spe_read_sysreg()?
> + return 0;
> + }
> +}
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260903160623.315525-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com?part=16
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 16:05 [RFC PATCH v7 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/28] arm64/sysreg: Add the nVM field to PMBLIMITR_EL1 Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/28] arm64/sysreg: Define MDCR_EL2.E2PB values Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/28] KVM: arm64: Add CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE Kconfig option Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Move struct arm_spe_pmu to a separate header file Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Add PMBIDR_EL1 and PMSIDR_EL1 to struct arm_spe_pmu Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_SPE capability Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_ARM_VCPU_SPE VCPU feature Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if protected KVM is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Enable SPE virtualization only in VHE mode Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if nested virt is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/28] KVM: arm64: Add a new VCPU device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the interrupt number Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the SPE device Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 9:32 ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to initialize SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/28] KVM: arm64: Use PMSVer from the assigned SPE instance Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 10:26 ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:32 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-04 10:28 ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/28] KVM: arm64: Apply a RES0 mask to PMBLIMITR_EL1 writes Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 10:41 ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/28] KVM: arm64: config: Use functions from spe.c to test FEAT_SPE_{FnE,FDS} Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/28] KVM: arm64: VHE: Context switch SPE state Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 11:35 ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/28] KVM: arm64: Allow guest SPE physical timestamps only if kernel allows it Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 13:45 ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/28] KVM: arm64: Handle SPE maintenance interrupts Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 14:04 ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/28] arm64: errata: Disable SPE in KVM Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 23/28] KVM: arm64: Add kvm-arm.ignore_spe_errata kernel parameter Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 24/28] arm64: errata: Don't enable guest buffer if misprogrammed Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 17:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 25/28] KVM: arm64: at: Use callback for reading descriptor Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 26/28] KVM: arm64: Map memory on a SPE stage 2 fault Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 17:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 27/28] KVM: arm64: Handle dirty page logging when SPE feature is set Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 17:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 14:41 ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 28/28] KVM: arm64: Allow the creation of a SPE enabled VM Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 14:09 ` Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903163250.3F3531F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.