From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Nicholas Carlini <npc@anthropic.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: Check faultable stack helper contexts
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 23:47:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903214758.2727663-7-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903214758.2727663-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Add verifier coverage for the sleepable bpf_get_stack() and
bpf_get_task_stack() implementations. Call each helper while preemption is
disabled and require the verifier to reject it as sleepable.
Both programs load when the prototypes lack might_sleep, so the
expected-failure tests fail. Keep success controls outside the
non-preemptible region to ensure ordinary calls from sleepable uprobes
remain valid.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c
index 6d5fce7e6ffc..81c459435680 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/preempt_lock.c
@@ -115,6 +115,58 @@ int preempt_sleepable_helper(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("?uprobe.s")
+__failure __msg("sleepable helper bpf_get_stack#")
+int preempt_sleepable_get_stack(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_stack_build_id stack;
+
+ bpf_preempt_disable();
+ bpf_get_stack(ctx, &stack, sizeof(stack),
+ BPF_F_USER_STACK | BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID);
+ bpf_preempt_enable();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?uprobe.s")
+__failure __msg("sleepable helper bpf_get_task_stack#")
+int preempt_sleepable_get_task_stack(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_stack_build_id stack;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
+ bpf_preempt_disable();
+ bpf_get_task_stack(task, &stack, sizeof(stack),
+ BPF_F_USER_STACK | BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID);
+ bpf_preempt_enable();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?uprobe.s")
+__success
+int sleepable_get_stack(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_stack_build_id stack;
+
+ bpf_get_stack(ctx, &stack, sizeof(stack),
+ BPF_F_USER_STACK | BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?uprobe.s")
+__success
+int sleepable_get_task_stack(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_stack_build_id stack;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
+ bpf_get_task_stack(task, &stack, sizeof(stack),
+ BPF_F_USER_STACK | BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID);
+ return 0;
+}
+
SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
__failure __msg("kernel func bpf_copy_from_user_str is sleepable within non-preemptible region")
int preempt_sleepable_kfunc(void *ctx)
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 21:47 [PATCH bpf v1 0/8] Misc bug fixes - part 2 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 1/8] bpf: Check ancestor frames for rbtree callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:40 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-03 22:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 2/8] selftests/bpf: Check rbtree callback restrictions in subprogs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 3/8] bpf: Mark bpf_btf_find_by_name_kind() as sleepable Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:15 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: Test btf lookup helper sleepability Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 5/8] bpf: Mark faultable stack helpers as sleepable Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 22:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-03 22:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-09-03 22:56 ` [PATCH bpf v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: Check faultable stack helper contexts bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 7/8] bpf: Reject legacy packet loads from callbacks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-03 21:58 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-09-04 2:22 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-03 21:47 ` [PATCH bpf v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-04 2:30 ` [PATCH bpf v1 0/8] Misc bug fixes - part 2 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903214758.2727663-7-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=npc@anthropic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.