From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for by-value arguments up to 16 bytes
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 22:10:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904051049.3982644-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904050957.3976119-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Extend the by-value argument test with the aggregate cases, written in C
so that they depend on the compiler lowering the argument into a pair of
argument registers rather than on a hand-written register layout.
The programs cover a struct and a union that fill two registers, a
smaller struct that fills one, and two struct arguments in a row, each
with an int argument on either side so that a wrong slot count shows up
as a wrong value in the parameters around it, alongside the __int128
already there. A global function taking a struct with a pointer member
is rejected: the callee would receive the pointer as an opaque scalar.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_int128_arg.c | 164 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 164 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_int128_arg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_int128_arg.c
index 044fc4a80055..b10fb4aeb405 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_int128_arg.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_int128_arg.c
@@ -7,6 +7,131 @@
#define MIX_A 0xdeadbeefcafef00dULL
#define MIX_B 0x0123456789abcdefULL
+struct pair {
+ __u64 lo;
+ __u64 hi;
+};
+
+struct small {
+ __u32 a;
+ __u32 b;
+};
+
+union upair {
+ __u64 halves[2];
+ struct {
+ __u64 lo;
+ __u64 hi;
+ } parts;
+};
+
+struct with_ptr {
+ void *p;
+ __u64 x;
+};
+
+static __noinline __u64 take_pair(int a, struct pair p, int c)
+{
+ return (__u64)a + p.lo + p.hi + c;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_static_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u64 a = skb->len ^ MIX_A;
+ __u64 b = skb->len ^ MIX_B;
+ struct pair p = { .lo = a, .hi = b };
+
+ if (take_pair(1, p, 2) != a + b + 3)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#if defined(__clang__)
+
+__noinline __u64 take_pair_global(int a, struct pair p, int c)
+{
+ return (__u64)a + p.lo + p.hi + c;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_global_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u64 a = skb->len ^ MIX_A;
+ __u64 b = skb->len ^ MIX_B;
+ struct pair p = { .lo = a, .hi = b };
+
+ if (take_pair_global(1, p, 2) != a + b + 3)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__noinline __u64 take_two_pairs_global(struct pair p, struct pair q)
+{
+ return p.lo + p.hi + q.lo + q.hi;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_two_structs_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u64 a = skb->len ^ MIX_A;
+ __u64 b = skb->len ^ MIX_B;
+ struct pair p = { .lo = a, .hi = b };
+ struct pair q = { .lo = b, .hi = a };
+
+ if (take_two_pairs_global(p, q) != 2 * (a + b))
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__noinline __u64 take_small_global(int a, struct small s, int c)
+{
+ return (__u64)a + s.a + s.b + c;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_small_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u32 a = skb->len ^ (__u32)MIX_A;
+ __u32 b = skb->len ^ (__u32)MIX_B;
+ struct small s = { .a = a, .b = b };
+
+ if (take_small_global(1, s, 2) != (__u64)a + b + 3)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__noinline __u64 take_upair_global(int a, union upair u, int c)
+{
+ return (__u64)a + u.parts.lo + u.parts.hi + c;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_union_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u64 a = skb->len ^ MIX_A;
+ __u64 b = skb->len ^ MIX_B;
+ union upair u;
+
+ u.halves[0] = a;
+ u.halves[1] = b;
+ if (take_upair_global(1, u, 2) != a + b + 3)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
+
typedef unsigned __int128 u128;
__noinline __u64 take_i128_global(int a, u128 v, int c)
@@ -28,4 +153,43 @@ int aggregate_arg_int128_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
return 0;
}
+#if defined(__BPF_FEATURE_STACK_ARGUMENT)
+
+static __noinline __u64 take_spilled_pair(int a, int b, int c, int d, struct pair p)
+{
+ return (__u64)a + b + c + d + p.lo + p.hi;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__arch_x86_64 __arch_arm64
+__success __retval(0)
+int aggregate_arg_spilled_struct_c_test(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ __u64 a = skb->len ^ MIX_A;
+ __u64 b = skb->len ^ MIX_B;
+ struct pair p = { .lo = a, .hi = b };
+ int n = skb->len;
+
+ if (take_spilled_pair(n, n + 1, n + 2, n + 3, p) != a + b + 4 * n + 6)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+__noinline __u64 take_with_ptr_global(struct with_ptr s)
+{
+ return s.x;
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__failure __msg("type STRUCT in take_with_ptr_global() is not composed of scalars")
+int aggregate_arg_ptr_member_fail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct with_ptr s = { .p = skb, .x = skb->len };
+
+ return take_with_ptr_global(s);
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 5:09 [PATCH bpf-next 00/12] bpf: Support by-value struct and __int128 arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/12] selftests/bpf: Add a test for an __int128 by-value argument Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/12] bpf: Index global function arguments by argument slot Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/12] bpf: Support by-value struct arguments up to 16 bytes Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 4:17 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 6:09 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 4:19 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Support __int128 as a by-value function argument Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 4:20 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 6:09 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 4:21 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/12] bpf: Support by-value struct and __int128 kfunc arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 6:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 4:22 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 6:24 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 4:23 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/12] bpf: Add a JIT helper for the outgoing stack of kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 4:26 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/12] bpf, x86: Place kfunc arguments per the SysV calling convention Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 4:27 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 23:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-06 20:15 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-08 4:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-08 5:02 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-08 5:10 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-08 15:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-08 18:43 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-09 1:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-04 5:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/12] bpf: Record a 16-byte argument alignment in the function model Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 6:09 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 4:28 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/12] bpf, arm64: Place kfunc arguments per AAPCS64 Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 6:09 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-04 5:10 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-09-04 5:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for by-value arguments up to 16 bytes sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 4:33 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 6:09 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 4:34 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm tests for by-value arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 6:09 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-08 4:35 ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-04 5:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for by-value kfunc arguments Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904051049.3982644-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.