From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D0DC79F81 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 06:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1x2NSo-00027h-FM; Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:31:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1x2NSm-00020O-1V; Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:31:48 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.18]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1x2NSk-000636-Ky; Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:31:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1788503507; x=1820039507; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yJz0hmZ3jXnW+3e70x7bossu4Qz0K/22Q4P/UCuWfMU=; b=Dvy/rdBVIoLIRVNpF+g2C6n7enlgfRo2I7MuIVduH0AIt6zVsDJ59YQK TLiRgmZLyb+OS3PvuDt7xGdXlTqSR6deUvGXZuiykde2Ez7Re9WbR76E5 TFde9FzLNufBw3lOrr/lIGaTcTFDvAA/9HzWCLpZxukHjmCCrW8tHKAjY S2pIvJV2nqH5x9hui8CgPeXWE4UwEBZe25NIZj2s+hsCRZ3Y+LF5jfo3n bG0ftBxbB4TXzmCcbqiVdDvj6ax0Q/gllMxl4RBv6Z6GvBLkTJak6dObB Dohm6AnJdNqQ7v2LMnnUa1qR7F/BWvhcKGy3CYXWvef9OrV3nBdZioRyF g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: e3Xb1HXiREaxoFNG6eROPQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ykNovcd9TqinCGBoqu69Cg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11895"; a="89053536" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,260,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="89053536" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2026 23:31:44 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nYq0w4UjT6CUQyNTv8GS3w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UZGknod0QUmMZu+qNK6HxQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,260,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="263755465" Received: from junjie-desk-dev.bj.intel.com ([10.238.152.71]) by fmviesa009-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2026 23:31:39 -0700 From: Junjie Cao To: Chen Pei Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, alistair.francis@wdc.com, mst@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, sunilvl@ventanamicro.com, sunilvl@oss.qualcomm.com, jic23@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, liwei1518@gmail.com, daniel.barboza@oss.qualcomm.com, zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com, chao.liu@processmission.com, anisinha@redhat.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com, guoren@kernel.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] tests/qtest: Add RISC-V ACPI bios tables test for CXL Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 14:31:30 +0800 Message-ID: <20260904063131.452351-1-junjie.cao@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20260831132340.5345-6-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20260831132340.5345-6-cp0613@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.175.65.18; envelope-from=junjie.cao@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-riscv-bounces+qemu-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-riscv-bounces+qemu-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Hi Chen Pei, On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 21:23:36 +0800, Chen Pei wrote: > + .uefi_fl1 = "pc-bios/edk2-riscv-code.fd", > + .uefi_fl2 = "pc-bios/edk2-riscv-vars.fd", master renamed these to edk2-riscv64-{code,vars}.fd since v4 (2e0eeac953, in the 1 Sep firmware pull), so on 99e54ab5e7 this case does not get QEMU up: "Could not open 'pc-bios/edk2-riscv-code.fd'". riscv-to-apply.next has not picked up the rename yet; v6 still wants the new names. Many thanks, Junjie