From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hemanth Selam" <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] input: fix repeated words in comments
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 11:32:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904113236.8C09E1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904111911.32224-3-hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Low] The patch incorrectly fixes a typo, resulting in a grammatically incomplete sentence.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Repeated firmware updates via sysfs leak `input_dev` structures and devres nodes due to manual unregistration of a devm-managed device without freeing it.
- [High] The `serio->lock` spinlock is accessed uninitialized if an interrupt fires before `serio_register_port()` completes.
- [High] A Use-After-Free can occur on `q40kbd->port` during device removal if a pending interrupt fires before `free_irq()`.
--
commit 45b867db64f6ee078771ef7b8cf723b44cd0fd23
Author: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
input: fix repeated words in comments
Drop words accidentally written twice, reported by checkpatch.pl as a
possible repeated word. Only touches comments, no code changes.
Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/q40kbd.c b/drivers/input/serio/q40kbd.c
> index 2f553efbe649d..7ab4db61e46fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/serio/q40kbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/q40kbd.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void q40kbd_stop(void)
>
> /*
> * q40kbd_open() is called when a port is open by the higher layer.
> - * It allocates the interrupt and enables in in the chip.
> + * It allocates the interrupt and enables in the chip.
[Severity: Low]
Does this typo fix leave the sentence grammatically incomplete? The original
text "enables in in the chip" appears to be a typo for "enables it in the
chip".
> */
>
> static int q40kbd_open(struct serio *port)
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does cyapa_update_fw_store() leak memory and
devres tracking nodes on every firmware update?
drivers/input/mouse/cyapa.c:cyapa_update_fw_store() {
...
input_unregister_device(cyapa->input);
cyapa->input = NULL;
...
}
Manual unregistration of a devm-allocated device without freeing it leaves the
devres tracking node and memory orphaned. When cyapa_reinitialize() is called,
it allocates a new input device, creating a new devres node.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can the serio port spinlock be accessed
uninitialized if an interrupt fires before q40kbd_probe() completes?
drivers/input/serio/q40kbd.c:q40kbd_probe() {
...
error = request_irq(Q40_IRQ_KEYBOARD, q40kbd_interrupt, 0,
DRV_NAME, q40kbd);
...
serio_register_port(q40kbd->port);
...
}
If an interrupt fires when request_irq() is called, q40kbd_interrupt() will
call serio_interrupt(), which acquires serio->lock. However, the spinlock
isn't initialized until serio_register_port() is called.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a use-after-free race during
device removal if a pending interrupt fires before the IRQ is freed?
drivers/input/serio/q40kbd.c:q40kbd_remove() {
...
serio_unregister_port(q40kbd->port);
free_irq(Q40_IRQ_KEYBOARD, q40kbd);
...
}
While serio_unregister_port() calls the close method to mask the hardware
interrupt, it does not wait for already-running handlers. If
q40kbd_interrupt() is executing on another CPU, it can dereference
q40kbd->port after it has been freed by serio_unregister_port().
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904111911.32224-1-hemanth.selam@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260904111911.32224-1-hemanth.selam@gmail.com>
2026-09-04 11:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] input: fix typos in comments Hemanth Selam
2026-09-04 11:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] input: fix repeated words " Hemanth Selam
2026-09-04 11:32 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07 4:23 ` Hemanth Selam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904113236.8C09E1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hemanth.selam@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.