From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate memory error section length before payload access
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:12:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904181210.E154F1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904172337.1409775-12-dave.jiang@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch fixes length validation in ghes_do_proc() but leaves an identical logic flaw and buffer over-read unfixed in cper_print_mem().
--
commit 8bbaca1beceadb4f3349da69c4f0bedd1d913c54
Author: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate memory error section length before payload access
This patch adds length validation in ghes_do_proc() before accessing the
CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM payload to prevent reading past the record. It ensures
records are at least 73 bytes and validates the remaining length based on the
claimed fields.
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714231835.303081-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=7
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 111895c57c2f9..2077cc90569a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -954,6 +976,25 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
> if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PLATFORM_MEM)) {
> struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>
> + /*
> + * Check once for all three consumers below. The 73-byte
> + * UEFI 2.1/2.2 layout is the floor, matching
> + * cper_estatus_print_section() and making
> + * validation_bits safe to read.
> + */
> + if (gdata->error_data_length <
> + sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old))
> + continue;
> +
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does leaving cper_print_mem()
unfixed bypass these newly added safety checks?
As noted in the commit message, cper_print_mem() gets the mask checking
wrong. When firmware provides a CPER memory error record with a length
between 74 and 79 bytes, the exact match check in cper_print_mem() fails to
catch the invalid length:
drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c:cper_print_mem() {
...
/* Don't trust UEFI 2.1/2.2 structure with bad validation bits */
if (len == sizeof(struct cper_sec_mem_err_old) &&
(mem->validation_bits & ~(CPER_MEM_VALID_RANK_NUMBER - 1))) {
pr_err(FW_WARN "valid bits set for fields beyond structure\n");
return;
}
...
}
Because ghes_proc() calls ghes_print_estatus() before ghes_do_proc(), this
code executes before the new checks in this patch are reached.
When cper_print_mem() then calls cper_mem_err_pack(), it blindly reads
out-of-bounds fields if the payload is smaller than 80 bytes:
drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c:cper_mem_err_pack() {
...
if (mem->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_MODULE_HANDLE)
cmem->mem_dev_handle = mem->mem_dev_handle;
...
}
Could this result in an out-of-bounds memory read (such as mem_dev_handle
at offset 78) and an information leak to dmesg before ghes_do_proc() has a
chance to reject the malformed record?
> + /* Then require what the claimed fields actually need. */
> + if (gdata->error_data_length <
> + ghes_mem_err_min_len(mem_err->validation_bits)) {
> + pr_warn_ratelimited(FW_WARN GHES_PFX
> + "memory error section too small (%u) for the fields it claims\n",
> + gdata->error_data_length);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> atomic_notifier_call_chain(&ghes_report_chain, sev, mem_err);
>
> arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904172337.1409775-1-dave.jiang@intel.com?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 17:23 [PATCH v6 00/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Collection of fixes for issues reported by sashiko Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] efi/cper: Reject CPER records with an out-of-range error_data_length Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] efi/cper: Reject an error status block length that wraps a u32 Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] ACPI: extlog: Validate elog record length before walking sections Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] ACPI: extlog: Defer CXL protocol error handling to avoid lock inversion Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] ACPI: extlog: Avoid populating software AER metadata from raw hardware buffer Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] ACPI: extlog: Validate PCIe error section length before payload access Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] ACPI: extlog: Fix CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER guard typo Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound CXL event record copy to the firmware section length Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate CXL protocol error section length before RAS cap copy Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 18:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] efi/cper: Read only validated fields in cper_mem_err_pack() Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 18:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Validate memory error section length before payload access Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 18:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Bound AER info copy and sanitize software metadata Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 18:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] cxl/ras: Make cxl_cper_handle_prot_err() static Dave Jiang
2026-09-04 18:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 00/13] ACPI: APEI: GHES: Collection of fixes for issues reported by sashiko Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-04 19:44 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904181210.E154F1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.