All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/24] drm/xe: Add XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 21:33:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904213359.C53C61F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904211613.3934307-7-matthew.brost@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Premature drop of VM reference in xe_bo_put_commit() allows the VM and its shared dma-resv to be freed while the BO is still alive in TTM, leading to a use-after-free on the resv.
--

commit b2fad1ac33df0229950ed8b4d71c885827c4b7e3
Author: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

drm/xe: Add XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC

This commit adds a new flag, XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC, which indicates that an
asynchronous BO put should also drop an additional reference to the BO's VM to
prevent the shared dma-resv from disappearing before the BO.

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260228013501.106680-7-matthew.brost@intel.com

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> index b162753cebb70..aea4b0fee8e33 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> @@ -3998,8 +3998,14 @@ void xe_bo_put_commit(struct llist_head *deferred)
>  	if (!freed)
>  		return;
>  
> -	llist_for_each_entry_safe(bo, next, freed, freed)
> +	llist_for_each_entry_safe(bo, next, freed, freed) {
> +		struct xe_vm *vm = bo->vm;
> +		bool async = bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC;
> +
>  		drm_gem_object_free(&bo->ttm.base.refcount);
> +		if (async)
> +			xe_vm_put(vm);

[Severity: High]
Does this sequence drop the VM reference prematurely and risk a use-after-free
on the VM's dma_resv?

Looking at xe_bo_put_commit(), we call drm_gem_object_free(), which can
trigger ttm_bo_release(). If ttm_bo_individualize_resv() fails due to
memory pressure while the VM's shared dma_resv is concurrently locked by
another thread, TTM handles this by queuing the BO for delayed deletion
via ttm_bo_delayed_delete() and returning early.

If TTM returns early keeping the BO alive, and we immediately proceed
to drop the VM reference here:

    drm_gem_object_free(&bo->ttm.base.refcount);
    if (async)
        xe_vm_put(vm);

could this free the VM and its embedded dma_resv if it was the last
reference? Later, when ttm_bo_delayed_delete() executes, it would
attempt to call dma_resv_lock(bo->base.resv) on the freed VM resv,
causing a regression.

Is there a mechanism to ensure the VM stays alive as long as TTM delays the
BO deletion?

> +	}
>  }

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904211613.3934307-1-matthew.brost@intel.com?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-04 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04 21:15 [PATCH v6 00/24] CPU binds and ULLS on migration queue Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 01/24] drm/xe: Drop struct xe_migrate_pt_update argument from populate/clear vfuns Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 02/24] drm/xe: Add xe_migrate_update_pgtables_cpu_execute helper Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 03/24] drm/xe: Decouple exec queue idle check from LRC Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 04/24] drm/xe: Add job count to GuC exec queue snapshot Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 05/24] drm/xe: Update xe_bo_put_deferred arguments to include writeback flag Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 06/24] drm/xe: Add XE_BO_FLAG_PUT_VM_ASYNC Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:33   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-11 13:10   ` Francois Dugast
2026-09-11 19:54     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-12  0:27       ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 07/24] drm/xe: Update scheduler job layer to support PT jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 15:24   ` Francois Dugast
2026-09-11 19:25     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 08/24] drm/xe: Add helpers to access PT ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 09/24] drm/xe: Add struct xe_pt_job_ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:15 ` [PATCH v6 10/24] drm/xe: Update GuC submission backend to run PT jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/24] drm/xe: Store level in struct xe_vm_pgtable_update Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 12/24] drm/xe: Don't use migrate exec queue for page fault binds Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 13/24] drm/xe: Enable CPU binds for jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 14/24] drm/xe: Remove unused arguments from xe_migrate_pt_update_ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 15/24] drm/xe: Make bind queues operate cross-tile Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 16/24] drm/xe: Add CPU bind layer Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 17/24] drm/xe: Add device flag to enable PT mirroring across tiles Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 18/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS support to LRC Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 19/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to migration layer Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 20/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to ring ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 21/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to GuC submission Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 22/24] drm/xe: Enter ULLS for migration jobs upon page fault or SVM prefetch Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 23/24] drm/xe: Add modparam to enable / disable ULLS on migrate queue Matthew Brost
2026-09-09  8:03   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-09-09 18:11     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 24/24] drm/xe: Document ULLS for migration jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-09  9:01   ` Thomas Hellström
2026-09-09 17:53     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-04 21:24 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for CPU binds and ULLS on migration queue (rev8) Patchwork
2026-09-04 21:26 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-04 22:16 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-05  3:34 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260904213359.C53C61F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.