All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: zihan xi <zihanx@nebusec.ai>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	vega@nebusec.ai
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] udp: diag: bound bucket lock hold time
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 20:02:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260905190217.GE40544@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAANe3eRpVGnYpygfiQTsXd2VmBO43P-P1RfREkdDypgXBZB9Uw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Sep 05, 2026 at 11:49:05PM +0800, zihan xi wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2026 at 11:12 PM Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> > email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> > Full review at: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/133b6aee9e2c908c9da37d5585b3d2cd016906cd.1788187473.git.zihanx@nebusec.ai?part=1
> > ---
> > udp: diag: bound bucket lock hold time
> >
> > This patch limits the time the UDP hash bucket spinlock is held during
> > netlink socket dumps by collecting a bounded batch of matching sockets.
> > It takes a reference to each socket, releases the lock, processes the
> > batch, and resumes from a preserved cursor.
> >
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_diag.c b/net/ipv4/udp_diag.c
> > > index f4b24e628cf8d..18cfe0df654dd 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/udp_diag.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp_diag.c
> > [ ... ]
> > > +static void udp_diag_dump_done(struct netlink_callback *cb)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct inet_diag_dump_data *cb_data = cb->data;
> > > +     struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)cb->args[2];
> > > +
> > > +     if (sk) {
> > > +             cb->args[2] = 0;
> > > +             sock_put(sk);
> > > +     }
> > > +     cb_data->dump_done = NULL;
> > > +     module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> > > +}
> >
> > [Severity: High]
> > Does this module_put() introduce a race condition with module unloading?
> >
> > When an active netlink dump for UDP sockets finishes, inet_diag_dump_done()
> > invokes udp_diag_dump_done(). This function drops its module reference using
> > module_put(THIS_MODULE) as its final step.
> >
> > If this was the last reference, a concurrent rmmod udp_diag operation can
> > proceed and unmap the module's text segment before the thread executing
> > udp_diag_dump_done() executes its return instruction to return to inet_diag.
> >
> > Could this result in a kernel panic due to the CPU attempting to execute
> > unmapped memory?
> 
> Yes.  If that module_put() drops the last reference, rmmod can unmap
> udp_diag while dump_done() is still returning to inet_diag.
> 
> I will keep the extra module_get() in udp_diag_dump(), and move the
> matching module_put() into inet_diag_dump_done() so it runs after the
> callback has returned.

I think that the fundamental problem here is that managing module lifecycle
from within the module itself tends to be unsafe. I'm not sure your
proposal addresses that problem.

I think one possible solution is to move the module_put into delayed work.
And another, is to move module lifecycle handling into the core.

Possibly the first option is cleaner as I think that only udp_diag
has the need for this.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-05 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01  9:25 [PATCH net 0/1] udp: diag: bound bucket lock hold time Zihan Xi
2026-09-01  9:25 ` [PATCH net 1/1] " Zihan Xi
2026-09-05 15:12   ` Simon Horman
2026-09-05 15:49     ` zihan xi
2026-09-05 19:02       ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-09-06  4:08         ` zihan xi
2026-09-05 19:29       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-06  4:11         ` zihan xi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260905190217.GE40544@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vega@nebusec.ai \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    --cc=zihanx@nebusec.ai \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.