All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
	ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 16/22] bpf: Drop redundant BTF pointer helper write rejection
Date: Sat,  5 Sep 2026 15:01:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260905220117.922028-17-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260905220117.922028-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>

check_reg_type() rejects a trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID admitted by
mem_types unless the argument carries MEM_RDONLY. This duplicates
argument-specific memory access validation and is too conservative for
map keys and input map values, whose read direction is not represented
by MEM_RDONLY.

Since commit fa75b7c85b0d ("bpf: Enforce write checks for BTF pointer
helper access"), check_helper_mem_access() forwards the requested access
type to check_ptr_to_btf_access(). Map keys always request read access.
Map values request write access only when tagged with MEM_WRITE.
ARG_PTR_TO_MEM prototypes must carry either MEM_RDONLY or MEM_WRITE,
and size arguments use the direction of their associated memory
argument. btf_struct_access() therefore checks the effective access
direction in every case.

Drop the early rejection and keep check_reg_type() limited to register
admission.

Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1f5f975c73a7..09a51d67ab7e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -8469,16 +8469,8 @@ static int check_reg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *re
 	if (base_type(reg->type) != PTR_TO_BTF_ID)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (compatible == &mem_types) {
-		if (!(arg_type & MEM_RDONLY)) {
-			verbose(env,
-				"%s() may write into memory pointed by %s type=%s\n",
-				meta->func_name,
-				reg_arg_name(env, argno), reg_type_str(env, reg->type));
-			return -EACCES;
-		}
+	if (compatible == &mem_types)
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	switch ((int)reg->type) {
 	case PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
-- 
2.52.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-05 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-05 22:00 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/22] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc argument checks Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/22] bpf: Pass call metadata through shared " Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/22] bpf: Address check_func_arg() arguments by argno Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:44   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 17:37     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/22] bpf: Only compare func_id against BPF_FUNC_* for helper calls Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/22] bpf: Only compare func_id against kfunc BTF IDs for kfunc calls Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:44   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 17:47     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/22] bpf: Rename ambiguous function argument types Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:08   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 17:54     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/22] bpf: Unify kfunc argument kinds with enum bpf_arg_type Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:08   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 18:04     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/22] bpf: Align helper and kfunc ARG_PTR_TO_PROG_AUX handling Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:08   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 18:23     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/22] bpf: Classify kfunc arguments the verifier ignores Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:44   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 18:27     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/22] bpf: Set OBJ_RELEASE when generating kfunc argument types Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/22] bpf: Set MEM_UNINIT and dynptr subtypes when generating kfunc arg types Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/22] bpf: Set MEM_RCU when generating kfunc argument types Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:44   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 18:41     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 12/22] bpf: Resolve BTF ID of ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID in kfunc bpf_func_proto Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:08   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 20:42     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/22] bpf: Resolve ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_FIXED_SIZE size " Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 14/22] bpf: Consolidate runtime argument type resolution Amery Hung
2026-09-10 21:52   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-11 21:01     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 15/22] bpf: Consolidate nullable argument validation Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-09-05 23:08   ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 16/22] bpf: Drop redundant BTF pointer helper write rejection bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-09 20:48     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 17/22] bpf: Consolidate helper and kfunc PTR_TO_BTF_ID argument matching Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 18/22] bpf: Admit kfunc argument registers through check_reg_type() Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:23   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-10 16:18     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 19/22] selftests/bpf: Test kfunc packet memory direct writes Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:44   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11 20:46     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 20/22] bpf: Consolidate function call pkt_access validation Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 21/22] bpf: Consolidate release argument validation Amery Hung
2026-09-05 23:08   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11 20:47     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 22/22] bpf: Check helper and kfunc arguments in one path Amery Hung
2026-09-05 22:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 20:59     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-10 21:53   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-11 20:55     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-12  3:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/22] bpf: Unify helper and kfunc argument checks patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260905220117.922028-17-ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.