From: Tianyi Chen <hi@tychen.cc>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tianyi Chen <hi@tychen.cc>, Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover symbolic bpftool map creation flags
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 01:07:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906170715.1212085-3-hi@tychen.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906170715.1212085-1-hi@tychen.cc>
Check numeric and symbolic map creation flags, including combined and
repeated names, against map information read independently with libbpf.
Exercise malformed names and lists, update-only flags, empty input and
numeric range errors. Verify rejected input leaves no pinned map.
Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-6
Signed-off-by: Tianyi Chen <hi@tychen.cc>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_map_flags.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_map_flags.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_map_flags.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_map_flags.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..140401dd254
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpftool_map_flags.c
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf.h>
+#include <bpftool_helpers.h>
+#include <test_progs.h>
+
+static const struct map_flags_test {
+ const char *name;
+ const char *flags;
+ __u32 expected_flags;
+ const char *error;
+} tests[] = {
+ { "zero", "0", 0 },
+ { "decimal", "129", BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC | BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG },
+ { "hexadecimal", "0x81", BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC | BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG },
+ { "octal", "0201", BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC | BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG },
+ { "positive_sign", "+1", BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC },
+ { "single_name", "BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC", BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC },
+ { "combined_names", "BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC,BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG",
+ BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC | BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG },
+ { "repeated_name", "BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC,BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC", BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC },
+ { "unknown_name", "BPF_F_NOT_A_MAP_FLAG", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "other_command_flag", "BPF_F_PATH_FD", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "update_flag", "BPF_F_LOCK", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "abbreviated_name", "BPF_F_NO_PRE", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "lowercase_name", "bpf_f_no_prealloc", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "empty", "", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "whitespace", " ", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "empty_list", ",", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "leading_comma", ",BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "trailing_comma", "BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC,", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "empty_element", "BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC,,BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "number_then_name", "1,BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "name_then_number", "BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC,128", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "numeric_list", "1,128", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "whitespace_in_list", "BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC, BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "overflow_u32", "4294967296", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "overflow_hex", "0x100000000", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "overflow_u64", "18446744073709551616", 0, "can't parse" },
+ { "negative", "-1", 0, "can't parse" },
+ /* Numeric bits unknown to bpftool must still reach the kernel. */
+ { "all_bits", "0xffffffff", 0, "map create failed" },
+ { "invalid_combination", "BPF_F_RDONLY,BPF_F_WRONLY", 0, "map create failed" },
+};
+
+static void test_map_flags(const struct map_flags_test *test, const char *path)
+{
+ char cmd[MAX_BPFTOOL_CMD_LEN], output[1024] = {};
+ struct bpf_map_info info = {};
+ __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+ int fd, err;
+
+ /* Let the flags parser handle negative numbers instead of getopt(). */
+ err = snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd),
+ "-- map create %s type hash key 4 value 4 entries 1 name flags_test flags '%s' 2>&1",
+ path, test->flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(err, 0, "format_command") ||
+ !ASSERT_LT(err, sizeof(cmd), "command_length"))
+ return;
+
+ err = get_bpftool_command_output(cmd, output, sizeof(output));
+ if (test->error) {
+ ASSERT_NEQ(err, 0, "reject_flags");
+ ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(output, test->error, "error_message");
+ err = access(path, F_OK);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -1, "no_pin");
+ ASSERT_EQ(errno, ENOENT, "pin_absent");
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "create_map"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ fd = bpf_obj_get(path);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(fd, "open_map"))
+ goto cleanup;
+ if (ASSERT_OK(bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &info_len), "map_info"))
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.map_flags, test->expected_flags, "map_flags");
+ close(fd);
+cleanup:
+ unlink(path);
+}
+
+void test_bpftool_map_flags(void)
+{
+ char dir[] = "/sys/fs/bpf/bpftool_flags_XXXXXX";
+ char path[sizeof(dir) + sizeof("/map")];
+ int i;
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(mkdtemp(dir), "create_pin_dir"))
+ return;
+ snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/map", dir);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
+ if (test__start_subtest(tests[i].name))
+ test_map_flags(&tests[i], path);
+ }
+ ASSERT_OK(rmdir(dir), "remove_pin_dir");
+}
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-06 17:07 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpftool: Support symbolic map creation flags Tianyi Chen
2026-09-06 17:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpftool: Accept " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-06 18:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-06 17:07 ` Tianyi Chen [this message]
2026-09-07 1:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpftool: Support " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 1:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpftool: Accept " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 2:04 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-07 1:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover symbolic bpftool " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 2:04 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-07 2:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] bpftool: Support symbolic " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 2:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpftool: Accept " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 4:25 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-07 5:14 ` Tianyi Chen
2026-09-07 2:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover symbolic bpftool " Tianyi Chen
[not found] ` <88e01da6d4b68aae7b8df6c0956b78f082bcedab7eb588631405031f1425b146@mail.kernel.org>
2026-09-07 5:15 ` [bpf-next,v3,1/2] bpftool: Accept symbolic " Tianyi Chen
2026-09-11 2:53 ` Tianyi Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260906170715.1212085-3-hi@tychen.cc \
--to=hi@tychen.cc \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.