From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 03/12] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:02:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907040203.BA2941F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178875281237.93794.4844650709915505895.stgit@devnote2>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Modifying a debug address register while the breakpoint is enabled in DR7 violates the Intel SDM. This can occur due to a race condition with an NMI because the `cpu_dr7` shadow state is not temporarily updated.
--
commit ca38cc4e9ed0533dfe16175c78dba60903420a8b
Author: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
Wprobe needs to move an active per-CPU watchpoint without releasing and
reserving its hardware slot.
Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() as the architecture backend for
modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr(). It validates the new address, finds the
installed local slot, and updates the hardware debug register and per-CPU
shadow register.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/59637b96946653393a7ad3c7de094094796b39c2.1785067572.git.wangjinchao600@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 312550be3ad2b..99f0926298a85 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -129,6 +129,62 @@ int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
[ ... ]
> + do {
> + seq = this_cpu_inc_return(cpu_dr7_seq);
> +
> + /* Disable breakpoint in DR7 before updating address register */
> + dr7 = this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7);
> + set_debugreg((dr7 & ~__encode_dr7(i, info->len, info->type)) | DR7_FIXED_1, 7);
[Severity: High]
Does arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() need to clear the breakpoint in
the shadow cpu_dr7 state as well?
Since the breakpoint isn't cleared in the cpu_dr7 shadow state, could an NMI
that interrupts execution here inadvertently re-enable the breakpoint
prematurely?
If an NMI handler (such as kgdb or perf) modifies breakpoints, it increments
cpu_dr7_seq and invokes local_db_save() and local_db_restore(). When the NMI
completes, local_db_restore() detects the sequence mismatch and restores
hardware DR7 using the cpu_dr7 shadow cache. Because cpu_dr7 still has this
breakpoint enabled, the target breakpoint gets re-enabled in hardware DR7
before the execution below resumes.
> + barrier();
> +
> + this_cpu_write(cpu_debugreg[i], addr);
> + barrier();
> + set_debugreg(addr, i);
[Severity: High]
If an NMI prematurely restored DR7 as described above, won't this modify the
debug address register while the breakpoint is enabled in DR7?
Modifying a debug address register while its corresponding DR7 enable bit is
set violates the Intel SDM and causes spurious #DB exceptions.
While the sequence loop retry mechanism will catch the mismatch, it only does
so after this instruction has already executed, which is too late to prevent
the spurious exception.
> + barrier();
> +
> + /* Re-enable breakpoint in DR7 */
> + set_debugreg(this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7) | DR7_FIXED_1, 7);
> + barrier();
> + } while (seq != this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7_seq));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/178875277830.93794.14247844688761142429.stgit@devnote2?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 3:46 [PATCH v15 00/12] tracing: wprobe: x86: Add wprobe for watchpoint Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 3:46 ` [PATCH v15 01/12] x86/mce: Fix hardware debug register corruption on task migration Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 3:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:46 ` [PATCH v15 02/12] x86/hw_breakpoints: Make DR7 updates NMI safe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 4:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:46 ` [PATCH v15 03/12] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 4:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07 3:47 ` [PATCH v15 04/12] HWBP: Add modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 4:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:47 ` [PATCH v15 05/12] tracing/wprobe: Add wprobe (watchpoint probe) trace event support Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 4:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:47 ` [PATCH v15 06/12] x86: hw_breakpoint: Add a kconfig to clarify when a breakpoint fires Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 3:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:47 ` [PATCH v15 07/12] selftests: tracing: Add a basic testcase for wprobe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 3:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:47 ` [PATCH v15 08/12] selftests: tracing: Add syntax " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 3:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:47 ` [PATCH v15 09/12] tracing/wprobe: Add set_wprobe and clear_wprobe event triggers Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 4:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:48 ` [PATCH v15 10/12] selftests: tracing: Add wprobe trigger testcase Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 3:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:48 ` [PATCH v15 11/12] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF typecast in fetchargs Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 4:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:48 ` [PATCH v15 12/12] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF struct offset resolution in set_wprobe trigger Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-09-07 4:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 7:27 ` [PATCH v15 00/12] tracing: wprobe: x86: Add wprobe for watchpoint Jinchao Wang
2026-09-12 13:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907040203.BA2941F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.