All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] xfrm: iptfs: fix stack OOB read in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk()
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 11:29:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907093020.2228346-2-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907093020.2228346-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>

From: Roshan Kumar <roshaen09@gmail.com>

iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() advances to the fragment containing @offset
with an unbounded loop:

	while (offset >= walk->past + walk->frags[walk->fragi].len)
		walk->past += walk->frags[walk->fragi++].len;

walk->fragi is advanced and walk->frags[walk->fragi] is dereferenced
without ever checking fragi against walk->nr_frags. When the requested
offset is at or beyond the total length spanned by the walk's fragments,
fragi runs past nr_frags and off the end of the fixed-size on-stack
frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1] array, reading out-of-bounds stack memory.

The two callers behave differently: iptfs_skb_add_frags() already guards
against this with

	if (!walk->nr_frags ||
	    offset >= walk->total + walk->initial_offset)
		return len;

but iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() has no such guard and calls
iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() unconditionally, so it performs the
out-of-range walk. Its own "fragi < walk->nr_frags" bound check runs only
afterwards, too late to prevent the read.

This is reachable from the receive path: a crafted IP-TFS (AGGFRAG)
payload delivered to an IPTFS SA drives iptfs_reassem_cont() ->
iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() with an offset past the fragment total, e.g.:

  BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk+0x235/0x250
  Read of size 4 at addr ffff888008ad7210 by task repro/345
   iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk+0x235/0x250 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:392
   iptfs_skb_can_add_frags+0x155/0x310  net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:420
   iptfs_reassem_cont+0xcf8/0x1140      net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:902
   iptfs_input_ordered+0x552/0x670      net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:1280
   iptfs_input+0x3d6/0xde0              net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:1741
   xfrm_input+0x282f/0x6140             net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:700
   xfrm4_esp_rcv+0x93/0x120             net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c:104
   ip_rcv+0x278/0x2d0                   net/ipv4/ip_input.c:612

Give iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() the same up-front guard that
iptfs_skb_add_frags() already has, so the walk is never entered with an
out-of-range offset. When it triggers, the caller falls back to the
existing linearize-and-copy path, which is safe.

Fixes: 5f2b6a909574 ("xfrm: iptfs: add skb-fragment sharing code")
Reported-by: Roshan Kumar <roshaen09@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Roshan Kumar <roshaen09@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c
index 597aedeac26e..2ce15c472cc4 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c
@@ -416,6 +416,14 @@ static bool iptfs_skb_can_add_frags(const struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (skb_has_frag_list(skb) || skb->pp_recycle != walk->pp_recycle)
 		return false;
 
+	/* Reject an @offset that is at or beyond the end of the walk's data
+	 * before calling iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk(), whose fragment-advance
+	 * loop is otherwise unbounded and would index past walk->frags[].
+	 * This mirrors the guard already present in iptfs_skb_add_frags().
+	 */
+	if (!walk->nr_frags || offset >= walk->total + walk->initial_offset)
+		return false;
+
 	/* Make offset relative to current frag after setting that */
 	offset = iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk(walk, offset);
 
-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07  9:29 [PATCH 0/12] pull request (net): ipsec 2026-09-07 Steffen Klassert
2026-09-07  9:29 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2026-09-08 22:48   ` [PATCH 01/12] xfrm: iptfs: fix stack OOB read in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 02/12] xfrm: serialize state GC with device state flush Steffen Klassert
2026-09-08 22:48   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 03/12] xfrm: add missing RCU read lock in xfrm_send_migrate_state() Steffen Klassert
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfrm: iptfs: fix runt reassembly panic from short inner tot_len Steffen Klassert
2026-09-08 22:48   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 05/12] ipv6: xfrm: use full sockets in local error paths Steffen Klassert
2026-09-08 22:48   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 06/12] xfrm: fix compat ALLOCSPI request use-after-free Steffen Klassert
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 07/12] xfrm: add missing rcu_read_lock(), skb_dst_force() and dev_hold() for xfrm_trans_reinject() Steffen Klassert
2026-09-08 22:48   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 08/12] xfrm: use hlist_del_init_rcu for state_cache and state_cache_input Steffen Klassert
2026-09-08 22:48   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 09/12] esp: downgrade zerocopy managed frags before mutating skb frags Steffen Klassert
2026-09-08 22:49   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 10/12] xfrm: hold net_device reference under RCU in bundle creation Steffen Klassert
2026-09-08 22:49   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 11/12] xfrm: save input state data before secpath resets Steffen Klassert
2026-09-07  9:29 ` [PATCH 12/12] net: xfrm: reject unrepresentable espintcp transport headers Steffen Klassert
2026-09-08 22:49   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-09  6:38 ` Some clarifications on the upstreaming process (was: [PATCH 0/12] pull request (net): ipsec 2026-09-07) Steffen Klassert
2026-09-09  9:23   ` Some clarifications on the upstreaming process Paolo Abeni
2026-09-09 10:22     ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-10  8:17       ` Steffen Klassert
2026-09-10  8:35         ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-10  9:28           ` Steffen Klassert
2026-09-09 10:23     ` Steffen Klassert
2026-09-09 10:34       ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-09 10:44         ` Steffen Klassert
2026-09-09 18:57           ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-10  8:29             ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-10  9:02             ` Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260907093020.2228346-2-steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.