From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v9 05/14] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg length
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 12:37:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907113743.1453210-6-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907113743.1453210-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
rxrpc_send_data() is given two data lengths (len and msg->msg_iter.count)
and is inconsistent about how it uses them. Fix this by using len in
preference to msg->msg_iter.count. Also limit the amount copied to either
len or msg->msg_iter.count, whichever is smaller.
Note that, currently, all the callers have len and msg->msg_iter.count the
same and so the problem won't occur.
Fixes: 382d7974de31 ("RxRPC: Use iov_iter_count() in rxrpc_send_data() instead of the len argument")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
index 1d66e9808162..565799548102 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -379,9 +379,9 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
ret = -EMSGSIZE;
if (call->tx_total_len != -1) {
- if (len - copied > call->tx_total_len)
+ if (len > call->tx_total_len)
goto maybe_error;
- if (!more && len - copied != call->tx_total_len)
+ if (!more && len != call->tx_total_len)
goto maybe_error;
}
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
* the security header is going to be in the padded
* region (enc blocksize), but the trailer is not.
*/
- remain = more ? INT_MAX : msg_data_left(msg);
+ remain = more ? INT_MAX : len;
txb = call->conn->security->alloc_txbuf(call, remain, sk->sk_allocation);
if (!txb) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -416,8 +416,8 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
_debug("append");
/* append next segment of data to the current buffer */
- if (msg_data_left(msg) > 0) {
- size_t copy = umin(txb->space, msg_data_left(msg));
+ if (len > 0) {
+ size_t copy = min3(txb->space, len, msg_data_left(msg));
_debug("add %zu", copy);
if (!copy_from_iter_full(txb->data + txb->offset,
@@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
txb->len += copy;
txb->offset += copy;
copied += copy;
+ len -= copy;
if (call->tx_total_len != -1)
call->tx_total_len -= copy;
}
@@ -439,8 +440,8 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
/* add the packet to the send queue if it's now full */
if (!txb->space ||
- (msg_data_left(msg) == 0 && !more)) {
- if (msg_data_left(msg) == 0 && !more)
+ (len == 0 && !more)) {
+ if (len == 0 && !more)
txb->flags |= RXRPC_LAST_PACKET;
ret = call->security->secure_packet(call, txb);
@@ -449,7 +450,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
rxrpc_queue_packet(rx, call, txb, notify_end_tx);
txb = NULL;
}
- } while (msg_data_left(msg) > 0);
+ } while (len > 0 && msg_data_left(msg) > 0);
success:
ret = copied;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 11:37 [PATCH net v9 00/14] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 01/14] afs: Fix lack of loop around sendmsg() to rxrpc David Howells
2026-09-07 13:06 ` David Laight
2026-09-10 10:18 ` David Howells
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 02/14] afs: Fix afs to abort the rxrpc call on send error David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 03/14] rxrpc: Fix lack of loop around reply send in rxperf server David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 04/14] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg to not return an error if last packet queued David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` David Howells [this message]
2026-09-08 20:49 ` [PATCH net v9 05/14] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg length netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 06/14] rxrpc: Fix packet encryption error handling David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 07/14] rxrpc: Fix update of call->tx_pending without holding lock David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 08/14] rxrpc: Fix double IRQ enablement David Howells
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 09/14] rxrpc: Fix generation of notifications after call completion David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 10/14] rxrpc: Fix RxGK key parser to check enctype is supported David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 11/14] afs: Fix creation of RxGK CM channel token to have right size David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 12/14] afs: Fix lack of setting call->server when doing FS.InlineBulkStatus David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 13/14] rxrpc: fix use-after-free in rxrpc_poke_conn() David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-07 11:37 ` [PATCH net v9 14/14] rxrpc: Take write lock when publishing the initial RxGK key David Howells
2026-09-08 20:49 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907113743.1453210-6-dhowells@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.