From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com (mail-wr1-f51.google.com [209.85.221.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A39514759 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 10:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788863233; cv=none; b=AARyy+gkP7qsAJotEYYOZjOWE7enoohrGUnYchM5PA6XRPfovbQTXiCa4yoOAfELE3+asynPKDUlx0EHh+StHCW+dk77Y/dgBhpiq35Nb01gXXuV+k1OMG5GC2N4XGEja47GjptqnqkO1p7TPqBP5+9ioKH5Ldd42C/IYwn/U8c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788863233; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gHrC2/YHhVSXLSlS16u4AfY7KVkPWWCCH/ZFCWhkFIY=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=lsVXAvdT//7R9lEyUBD4Z6A0FSjEavteR4fWZ4c0pf9Kme3rGsUfyt8EaAt4pZaX670ZXH47irdLqZyWyyIjAU7A6LhEguCaP2TU+Kddjx5l6+TNTwM4mLW7/I8GVshYZon4y2yyzLVoZuIEQxcaMsWqI+JkQW0gcMSxAF5HmUQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=oNv6qwUX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="oNv6qwUX" Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4843e9c5960so4337992f8f.0 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2026 03:27:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1788863229; x=1789468029; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=V9VimnDRQb5JsH6MwJenn/EZqeiP6nyHnkrlQFEHImQ=; b=oNv6qwUXKIbDyk6Y5ybyrEmaNiQYaw0wMJTUzJlTEPL/eIEzCQRtDKw8TkdDAXHOLx EG2Rmm9d/3K7AC61GJX4rFNSTHcl2pssTAysGtKMfMFAssp/eMYJZUZ1SxQMOH9/id2e wteI+K2aj/4ZR/CkvUoE3r5Gzv0emrsmrhSrrlBNTPhoU/re181nnINDYohF5gcWMq8r gR/gJJishiKyX9rmMroupF4QgASH+1uiBrM/zID+YWE6mVwMnSuCLIH+hm7DallBXe09 R4FefmQYU3vz88RBOvOenwC4c3rBQmoEOtZYLeTZHLQ5j5JsGJHNWChKoHZjxQ/lV9WL n/gA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1788863229; x=1789468029; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=V9VimnDRQb5JsH6MwJenn/EZqeiP6nyHnkrlQFEHImQ=; b=iNrQsRQhoW7fWH/iViBtzSzqp2oyHlNbVYPsYhfrT/JEWyYhAdMAmFWyM9UDhrsGPZ 9F77a8rEkJamGaerNGyTIA1Busbrp9+2BdQOTAxZe444SVbHcf/tQxKJy8qn9cNYG96g +P7wGSudZ3KeLNeInOP7umirFdH7F+n/WoLDCxY4OdajeoO/JaXg//jmrPvv5aZpXPQ0 wKtrll6sR5g0TuqzYlob99AlvaPk67590Ytf+sr30dygsBTm+8v3jVMQIOinQ7JGRe/6 FyXqmon3VQwCYQ+Hwknq94pGYNIqoOyD2SAI9glIHnCtuknSvd+g2EWKCjt2H85XEyWz wB6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++m5enIphVDCwkfKsIlZI4gGZoSFGlWuNeCkXNtTwhQe3dSgmNEu +M3qabjwTcXN09RGfz0Jo3s0pA6dcnrJpHYtYDg5qfT4M76jZlkogQeH X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou04VFUTVJg/Em9xypDAQ6Vh3W5xKXwjDpc2EvRwxpk4b0bU8PAJYrhI/L9OtKK YMfr46U4TKOwqtOi+RTeSXgTnskSTGFkVBqzSLJOwrvCvYn9MO554gmE09doaqwdBH5x2DFdaRe Pgued0T91wWGhQRaBu0NYbPcDNJOdg3W8zlSXP+y6fi66FueFlimqqYa5jMjWbv9qFlDO3M+Aht /yTYak66eXd9jMaKVV2rpJcXIyAUzo8tFoOaX9IlqbyZNLaRwrzR9klpbDX7sr4ESoHt6lMpG4J sE60Ss/N8vbtY2RlYl31+ymX3o06G9ao1H8ol0PWZHEtxPU2apsfGqMYV7tdqiD/C6UasK8aaBH KmRPRiyUuLmmrmulo4tgIAvUCHHmPkceqp5lEwSQUZiu9TEAtkplmfFyGfTFkBov7eH1mZnY8jX b7pUYXV2HiPoMAbYgW9wMJL8VFy7/6fmjFjJz2ZH6L6LjOacA308QjYJ1yeNpHztiEQi1uciGtH qAsOfPrQIVoBuuqCixqjt3S16Y= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:4604:b0:485:8eac:265 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4858eac02b9mr20335819f8f.57.1788863229071; Tue, 08 Sep 2026 03:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.2] ([2a02:8109:d906:4e00:ed36:96cf:ac4a:2747]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-485885be1c1sm34446572f8f.32.2026.09.08.03.27.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Sep 2026 03:27:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Karthik Nayak Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 12:27:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v8 4/4] hook: introduce the receive-report hook Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20260908-758-introduce-hook-v8-4-be88a671ae1f@gmail.com> References: <20260908-758-introduce-hook-v8-0-be88a671ae1f@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20260908-758-introduce-hook-v8-0-be88a671ae1f@gmail.com> To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: ps@pks.im, gitster@pobox.com, jltobler@gmail.com, kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com, Phillip Wood , Karthik Nayak X-Mailer: b4 0.15.2 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=19440; i=karthik.188@gmail.com; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=gHrC2/YHhVSXLSlS16u4AfY7KVkPWWCCH/ZFCWhkFIY=; b=owJ4nAHtARL+kA0DAAoBPtWfJI5GjH8ByyZiAGqf4vfMCRkRLkTWTJWQCMIGo7r+VMfy01ZOc 58pTPscFYlk6YkBswQAAQoAHRYhBFfOTH9jdXEPy2XGBj7VnySORox/BQJqn+L3AAoJED7VnySO Rox/DTgL/1edUJbvIsGdTGAikCW/fC0oHi+B20dpMm7RURPcxFtuxzqu2gzqb+yY38VTGuiWDCS KiFSWh/1qSJk1I6bne/qluogwDlOO+UYJrpn5G1hf+jqyNCMJLs6cWt7tcbSbXaPlM3JPRlhVnQ GRAaNJq6xGqMqxT8xlvW6Ij3f1GEYS4SeI+PNgZzM7I54Yti+FegOBBjuj+G4AdF4AJffR8uIvZ aHqrJ/bQwTi09Da9FEmCcxxh3KbQ7KBP9un5f1fJanCNady86/8Kd8Mvzk9x7qUtMf5nDj0l3ph 2R9f8yeP35y0nYAykHHTSoWqWDg6v/OYn+lhEgUTrgXHWpHMlv0E2wlXHLOICQSlvyZWOUkjHpH 9leryJU2+VZu8XVaHgvbNlxCMPrUkDhIe2UQvpEnWX2lVeh0BdNr+D03nRTgk9OFnFyvHKm8wis 4KosgCv4N0ykRu8TV4o5BmLS4iuu2db401YVOXlS1Xrx3vdmRlb5g/RQcTDK/8MOtRm8uUlyN65 KQ= X-Developer-Key: i=karthik.188@gmail.com; a=openpgp; fpr=57CE4C7F6375710FCB65C6063ED59F248E468C7F When running 'git-receive-pack(1)', there is no way for the server to intercept and modify the status report before it is sent back to the client. Servers with custom logic may need to transform or gate the report based on the outcome of external logic post reference updates. This is specially needed for our usecase at GitLab where we have custom MVCC logic on top of Git which creates a new version for each push operation. The new version is only committed when certain external operations post reference transaction succeed. So reporting the correct message based on the outcome of these operations is important. The outcome of these operations is only known after `execute_commands()` has returned and before the report is written. There is no point in receive-pack where the server can act on that. We cannot use any of the existing hooks as: - The pre-receive hook runs too early, as we haven't updated references at that point yet and we need to have the full view of all resulting updates (both objects and references). - The update hook is too inefficient as it runs once per reference, and we cannot trivially determine the last update. - The reference-transaction hook is not suited for this. It fires from within `ref_transaction_commit()`, which is before the outcome we need to report is known, so there is no phase at which it could give us the answer. It also does not contain any knowledge regarding the push and cannot communicate with the clients. - The proc-receive hook replaces execute_commands() for references matching 'receive.procReceiveRefs'. We need to gate the report for the push as a whole. - The post-receive and post-update hooks cannot be used as they run too late, at the point where we have already reported success to the client. Introduce a new 'receive-report' hook. The hook receives the complete pkt-line encoded status report on standard input, after all ref updates have been applied to the repository by execute_commands() but before the report is sent to the client. See linkgit:gitprotocol-pack[5] details on the protocol structure. The hook's stdout fully replaces the report sent to the client. receive-pack fully buffers the hook's stdout before acting on the exit status, so the exit code is known before the client receives anything. This gives two distinct behaviors depending on exit status: - Exit 0: the hook's stdout is used as the report. The hook can rewrite 'ok' lines to 'ng' lines to signal per-ref rejection to the client while receive-pack itself exits cleanly. The client marks rejected refs as '[remote rejected]' and exits with a non-zero status if any ref is 'ng'. - Non-zero exit: the hook's stdout is discarded, receive-pack modifies all references to be rejected with a 'receive-report hook failed' error. In both cases, any output the hook writes to standard error is forwarded to the client over the sideband channel and appears as 'remote:' lines on the client terminal. Writing to stderr alone does not affect the push outcome. Reference updates applied by execute_commands() are not rolled back in either failure mode. The hook can cause the client to perceive the push as failed, but cannot undo server-side changes. This creates a divergence that the server cannot resolve: the client leaves its remote-tracking reference at the old value while the update is in fact applied, and a later fetch may reveal the update that the push reported as rejected. The hook is therefore only appropriate for servers which can guarantee that a rejected update is not observable by any reader. In our case the transaction committed by execute_commands() produces a candidate version which is not visible to other readers and is only published once the subsequent operations succeed, so a report of 'ng' corresponds to a version that is discarded rather than published. On a repository where a committed reference update is immediately visible, rejecting a push from this hook would instead leave the pusher with a view that does not match the server. This hook does not use the config-based hook infrastructure, which supports running multiple scripts per hook event. This hook is a bidirectional filter: it receives the report on stdin and writes a modified version to stdout. Running multiple such scripts sequentially would require piping the output of one into the input of the next, which the current hook infrastructure does not support. A single-script design is therefore a natural fit, and is consistent with how 'proc-receive' is structured for the same reason. Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak --- Documentation/git-receive-pack.adoc | 9 ++ Documentation/githooks.adoc | 61 ++++++++++ builtin/receive-pack.c | 47 ++++++++ t/meson.build | 1 + t/t5412-receive-report-hook.sh | 224 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 342 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/git-receive-pack.adoc b/Documentation/git-receive-pack.adoc index 5806792ba7..ab668ffa0c 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-receive-pack.adoc +++ b/Documentation/git-receive-pack.adoc @@ -245,6 +245,15 @@ commands will be executed by this hook, instead of by the internal `execute_commands()` function. This hook is responsible for updating the relevant references and reporting the results back to 'receive-pack'. +RECEIVE-REPORT HOOK +------------------- +This hook is invoked by 'git-receive-pack' after all the ref updates +have been applied but before the report is sent to the client. The hook +receives the complete report in pkt-line format on stdin and its stdout +replaces the report sent to the client, which allows the hook to rewrite +the outcomes or abort the push completely. See linkgit:githooks[5] for +the full protocol description. + QUARANTINE ENVIRONMENT ---------------------- diff --git a/Documentation/githooks.adoc b/Documentation/githooks.adoc index ed045940d1..145642bf05 100644 --- a/Documentation/githooks.adoc +++ b/Documentation/githooks.adoc @@ -527,6 +527,67 @@ The exit status of the hook is ignored for any state except for the status will cause the transaction to be aborted. The hook will not be called with "aborted" state in that case. +receive-report +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +This hook is invoked by linkgit:git-receive-pack[1] when it reacts to +`git push` and updates references in its repository. It executes on +the repository once after all refs have been updated and after all +accepted ref changes are applied to the repository, but before the +pkt-line encoded status report is sent back to the client. + +The hook receives the complete pkt-line encoded status report on +standard input, see linkgit:gitprotocol-pack[5] for details on the +structure. The hook's standard output entirely replaces the report +that is sent to the client. The hook must write a valid pkt-line +encoded report in the same format it received. The hook's stdout is +fully buffered by `receive-pack` before any data is sent to the client, +so the hook's exit status is known before the client receives anything. + +There are three distinct ways the hook can affect the push outcome: + +* To reject the push, modify the unpack status from `ok` to the required + error message. While `git-push` will fail, individual references may + still show success messages unless modified. + +* To reject individual ref updates while keeping `receive-pack` alive, + rewrite the corresponding `ok ` lines to + `ng [ ]` lines in the output and exit with status 0. + The client will then mark those specific refs as rejected while + treating any `ok` refs as successful. The push as a whole is + considered failed if any ref is `ng`, and `git push` will exit with + a non-zero status on the client side. + +* To abort the entire push unconditionally, exit with a non-zero + status. In this case the hook's stdout is discarded, `receive-pack` + modifies all references to be rejected with a 'receive-report hook + failed' error. + +Any output written to standard error is forwarded to the client over +the sideband channel and will appear as `remote:` lines on clients +using 'git-push(1)', regardless of the hook's exit status. Writing to +standard error alone does not affect the push outcome. + +Note that by the time this hook runs, all ref updates have already been +applied to the repository. Neither a non-zero exit nor rewriting refs +to `ng` rolls back any ref changes that were already committed +server-side. The hook can cause the client to perceive the push as +failed, but cannot undo the server-side updates. + +This means that reporting a reference as `ng` makes the client believe +the update did not happen while the server has in fact applied it. The +client leaves its remote-tracking reference at its old value, and a +later `git fetch` may reveal the very update that the push reported as +rejected. Neither Git nor the server can reconcile this; only the user, +by fetching again, will find out. + +This hook is therefore only appropriate for servers which can guarantee +that a rejected update is not observable by any reader, for example +because the committed transaction produces a candidate state that is +discarded rather than published. On a repository where a committed +reference update is immediately visible, using this hook to reject a +push will leave the pusher with a view that does not match the server. + push-to-checkout ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c index 8310844ab1..cadcc0ac8f 100644 --- a/builtin/receive-pack.c +++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c @@ -992,6 +992,41 @@ static int run_update_hook(struct command *cmd) return code; } +static int run_receive_report_hook(struct strbuf *report) +{ + struct child_process proc = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT; + struct async sideband_async; + int sideband_async_started = 0; + int saved_stderr = -1; + struct strbuf out = STRBUF_INIT; + const char *hook_path; + int ret; + + hook_path = find_hook(the_repository, "receive-report"); + if (!hook_path) + return 0; + + strvec_push(&proc.args, hook_path); + proc.trace2_hook_name = "receive-report"; + + prepare_sideband_async(&sideband_async, &saved_stderr, + &sideband_async_started); + + sigchain_push(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); + ret = pipe_command(&proc, report->buf, report->len, &out, + report->len, NULL, 0); + sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE); + + finish_sideband_async(&sideband_async, saved_stderr, + sideband_async_started); + + if (!ret) + strbuf_swap(&out, report); + + strbuf_release(&out); + return ret; +} + static struct command *find_command_by_refname(struct command *list, const char *refname) { @@ -2414,6 +2449,12 @@ static void update_shallow_info(struct command *commands, free(ref_status); } +static void override_cmds_error(struct command *commands, const char *err) +{ + for (struct command *cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next) + cmd->error_string = err; +} + /* * Generate the response to be sent to the client invoking 'git-receive-pack(1)'. */ @@ -2467,6 +2508,12 @@ static void report(struct command *commands, const struct strbuf *unpack_status, generate_report(&buf, commands, unpack_status, version); + if (run_receive_report_hook(&buf)) { + strbuf_reset(&buf); + override_cmds_error(commands, "receive-report hook failed"); + generate_report(&buf, commands, unpack_status, version); + } + if (use_sideband) send_sideband(1, 1, buf.buf, buf.len, use_sideband); else diff --git a/t/meson.build b/t/meson.build index 7f53cca7d1..692e6011c5 100644 --- a/t/meson.build +++ b/t/meson.build @@ -652,6 +652,7 @@ integration_tests = [ 't5409-colorize-remote-messages.sh', 't5410-receive-pack.sh', 't5411-proc-receive-hook.sh', + 't5412-receive-report-hook.sh', 't5500-fetch-pack.sh', 't5501-fetch-push-alternates.sh', 't5502-quickfetch.sh', diff --git a/t/t5412-receive-report-hook.sh b/t/t5412-receive-report-hook.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000000..24679de37b --- /dev/null +++ b/t/t5412-receive-report-hook.sh @@ -0,0 +1,224 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='test receive-report hook' + +GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main +export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME + +. ./test-lib.sh + +. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/t5411/common-functions.sh + +URL_PREFIX="\.\." + +test_expect_success "setup workbench" ' + git init workbench && + create_commits_in workbench A B +' + +test_expect_success "no report hook, push succeeds" ' + test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" && + test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" && + git init --bare upstream && + + git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream && + git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main && + git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 && + + make_user_friendly_and_stable_output actual && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + To ../upstream + .. -> main + EOF + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success "passthrough does not alter report" ' + test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" && + test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" && + git init --bare upstream && + + test_hook -C upstream --setup receive-report <<-\EOF && + cat + EOF + + git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream && + git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main && + git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 && + + make_user_friendly_and_stable_output actual && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + To ../upstream + .. -> main + EOF + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success "non-zero exit reports as hook failed" ' + test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" && + test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" && + + git init --bare upstream && + git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream && + git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main && + + test_hook -C upstream --setup receive-report <<-\EOF && + exit 1 + EOF + + test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 && + make_user_friendly_and_stable_output actual && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + To ../upstream + ! [remote rejected] -> main (receive-report hook failed) + EOF + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success "hook is invoked and receives report on stdin" ' + test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" && + test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" && + + git init --bare upstream && + test_hook -C upstream --setup receive-report <<-EOF && + tee raw + EOF + + git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream && + git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main && + git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 && + + make_user_friendly_and_stable_output actual && + cat >expect <<-EOF && + To ../upstream + .. -> main + EOF + test_cmp expect actual && + + test-tool pkt-line unpack actual-report && + cat >expect-report <<-EOF && + unpack ok + ok refs/heads/main + 0000 + EOF + test_cmp expect-report actual-report +' + +test_expect_success "hook can modify the report sent to client" ' + test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" && + test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" && + + git init --bare upstream && + git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream && + git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main && + + test_hook -C upstream --setup receive-report <<-\EOF && + test-tool pkt-line unpack | + sed "s/^ok /ng /" | + test-tool pkt-line pack + EOF + + test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 && + make_user_friendly_and_stable_output actual && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + To ../upstream + ! [remote rejected] -> main (failed) + EOF + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success "hook can modify the unpack status" ' + test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" && + test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" && + + git init --bare upstream && + git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream && + git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main && + + test_hook -C upstream --setup receive-report <<-\EOF && + test-tool pkt-line unpack | + sed "s/^unpack ok$/unpack push failed due to server error/" | + test-tool pkt-line pack + EOF + + test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 && + test_grep "error: remote unpack failed: push failed due to server error" out && + make_user_friendly_and_stable_output actual && + cat >expect <<-\EOF && + To ../upstream + .. -> main + EOF + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_expect_success "hook can report a custom failure message" ' + test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" && + test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" && + + git init --bare upstream && + git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream && + git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main && + + test_hook -C upstream --setup receive-report <<-\EOF && + echo "push rejected: service X is down" >&2 + test-tool pkt-line unpack | + sed "s/^ok \(.*\)/ng \1 service-x-is-down/" | + test-tool pkt-line pack | + tee raw + EOF + + test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 && + test_grep "push rejected: service X is down" out && + + test-tool pkt-line unpack actual-report && + cat >expect-report <<-\EOF && + unpack ok + ng refs/heads/main service-x-is-down + 0000 + EOF + test_cmp expect-report actual-report +' + +test_expect_success "hook stderr with zero exit status code" ' + test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" && + test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" && + + git init --bare upstream && + git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream && + git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main && + + test_hook -C upstream --setup receive-report <<-\EOF && + echo "push rejected: service X is down" >&2 + tee raw + EOF + + git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 && + test_grep "push rejected: service X is down" out && + + test-tool pkt-line unpack actual-report && + cat >expect-report <<-\EOF && + unpack ok + ok refs/heads/main + 0000 + EOF + test_cmp expect-report actual-report +' + +test_expect_success "hook stderr is relayed to client via sideband" ' + test_when_finished "rm -rf upstream" && + test_when_finished "git -C workbench remote remove origin" && + + git init --bare upstream && + git -C workbench remote add origin ../upstream && + git -C workbench push origin $A:refs/heads/main && + + test_hook -C upstream --setup receive-report <<-\EOF && + echo "hook-stderr-message" >&2 + exit 1 + EOF + + test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin $B:refs/heads/main >out 2>&1 && + test_grep "remote: hook-stderr-message" out +' + +test_done -- 2.55.GIT