From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootconfig: remove unreachable index checks in xbc_verify_tree()
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 10:46:29 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908104629.e7a85a90e376b843dbc51dc7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260905141637.1547429-1-ekffu200098@gmail.com>
On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 23:16:36 +0900
Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> wrote:
> xbc_verify_tree() checks that every node's next and child are below
> xbc_node_num. Both fields store the index of an existing node, which
> is below xbc_node_num.
This is a kind of foolpoof/defensive checking. (so I call it verify.)
>
> So remove the checks.
>
> No functional change.
Hmm, OK, I think we should decouple the logic/implementation
verification from runtime verification (e.g. wrong format)
and move the former to tools/bootconfig.
Thank you,
>
> Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
> ---
> lib/bootconfig.c | 13 +------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c
> index 89c88e359179..d383430637ee 100644
> --- a/lib/bootconfig.c
> +++ b/lib/bootconfig.c
> @@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ static int __init xbc_close_brace(char **k, char *n)
>
> static int __init xbc_verify_tree(void)
> {
> - int i, depth;
> + int depth;
> size_t len, wlen;
> struct xbc_node *n, *m;
>
> @@ -1022,17 +1022,6 @@ static int __init xbc_verify_tree(void)
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < xbc_node_num; i++) {
> - if (xbc_nodes[i].next >= xbc_node_num) {
> - return xbc_parse_error("No closing brace",
> - xbc_node_get_data(xbc_nodes + i));
> - }
> - if (xbc_nodes[i].child >= xbc_node_num) {
> - return xbc_parse_error("Broken child node",
> - xbc_node_get_data(xbc_nodes + i));
> - }
> - }
> -
> /* Key tree limitation check */
> n = &xbc_nodes[0];
> depth = 1;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-05 14:16 [PATCH] bootconfig: remove unreachable index checks in xbc_verify_tree() Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-09-08 1:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-09-08 15:34 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-09-08 23:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-09-09 1:27 ` Sang-Heon Jeon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908104629.e7a85a90e376b843dbc51dc7@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ekffu200098@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.