From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.18.y 2/4] ACPI: x86/rtc-cmos: Use platform device for driver binding
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 08:20:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908122004.2049483-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908122004.2049483-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 2a78e42104444f948698f1225deaf515e9b7224d ]
Modify the rtc-cmos driver to bind to a platform device on systems with
ACPI via acpi_match_table and advertise the CMOST RTC ACPI device IDs
for driver auto-loading. Note that adding the requisite device IDs to
it and exposing them via MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() is sufficient for this
purpose.
Since the ACPI device IDs in question are the same as for the CMOS RTC
ACPI scan handler, put them into a common header file and use the
definition from there in both places.
Additionally, to prevent a PNP device from being created for the CMOS
RTC if a platform one is present already, make is_cmos_rtc_device()
check cmos_rtc_platform_device_present introduced previously.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/13969123.uLZWGnKmhe@rafael.j.wysocki
Stable-dep-of: a3df8bbe0a70 ("ACPI: TAD: Add locking around AML evaluations")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/x86/cmos_rtc.c | 5 +----
drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 10 ++++++++++
include/linux/acpi.h | 6 ++++++
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
index 4ad88187dc7a0..7eb9561b95893 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static int is_cmos_rtc_device(struct acpi_device *adev)
{ "PNP0B02" },
{""},
};
- return !acpi_match_device_ids(adev, ids);
+ return !cmos_rtc_platform_device_present && !acpi_match_device_ids(adev, ids);
}
bool acpi_is_pnp_device(struct acpi_device *adev)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/cmos_rtc.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/cmos_rtc.c
index bdd66dfd4a441..a6df5b991c960 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/cmos_rtc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/cmos_rtc.c
@@ -18,10 +18,7 @@
#include "../internal.h"
static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_cmos_rtc_ids[] = {
- { "PNP0B00" },
- { "PNP0B01" },
- { "PNP0B02" },
- {}
+ ACPI_CMOS_RTC_IDS
};
bool cmos_rtc_platform_device_present;
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
index f8068c717fb85..7ac39c435f630 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -1482,6 +1483,14 @@ static __init void cmos_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
#else
static inline void cmos_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev) {}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_cmos_rtc_ids[] = {
+ ACPI_CMOS_RTC_IDS
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, acpi_cmos_rtc_ids);
+#endif
+
/*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* Platform setup should have set up an RTC device, when PNP is
@@ -1536,6 +1545,7 @@ static struct platform_driver cmos_platform_driver = {
.name = driver_name,
.pm = &cmos_pm_ops,
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(of_cmos_match),
+ .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(acpi_cmos_rtc_ids),
}
};
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 7d3a48f6425be..165ed21de842a 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -779,6 +779,12 @@ const char *acpi_get_subsystem_id(acpi_handle handle);
int acpi_mrrm_max_mem_region(void);
#endif
+#define ACPI_CMOS_RTC_IDS \
+ { "PNP0B00", }, \
+ { "PNP0B01", }, \
+ { "PNP0B02", }, \
+ { "", }
+
extern bool cmos_rtc_platform_device_present;
#else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 13:44 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: TAD: Add locking around AML evaluations" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-08 12:20 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 1/4] ACPI: x86: cmos_rtc: Create a CMOS RTC platform device Sasha Levin
2026-09-08 12:20 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-09-08 12:20 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 3/4] ACPI: TAD: Rearrange RT data validation checking Sasha Levin
2026-09-08 12:20 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 4/4] ACPI: TAD: Add locking around AML evaluations Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908122004.2049483-2-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.