From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at()
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:02:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909040249.243941F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909035813.162131-1-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The error-checking condition `!damon_nr_regions(t) != 2` is always true due to operator precedence, causing the test to unconditionally skip its core assertions.
--
commit 6fefc501724f8572d4bbc1782d2ab55fa7568e21
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at()
This patch updates damon_test_split_at() to verify the region count was
successfully changed before proceeding. This prevents invalid pointer
dereferences if the split fails.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260718001442.87129-3-sj@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260714142352.100478-1-sj@kernel.org [1]
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h
> index d8fef225930a5..1dd17d43a642c 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core-test.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static void damon_test_split_at(struct kunit *test)
> }
> damon_add_region(r, t);
> damon_split_region_at(t, r, 25);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 2);
> + if (!damon_nr_regions(t) != 2)
> + goto out;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this error-checking condition unintentionally skip the core assertions
of the test?
Because of operator precedence, !damon_nr_regions(t) evaluates to either 0
or 1. Neither 0 nor 1 equals 2, meaning the inequality (!= 2) is always true.
This seems to force the test to unconditionally take the goto out path,
bypassing the boundary validations it is designed to perform.
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 0ul);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 25ul);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909035813.162131-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2026090820-envoy-endanger-c99b@gregkh>
2026-09-09 3:58 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() SJ Park
2026-09-09 4:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 6:32 ` SJ Park
2026-09-09 6:34 ` SJ Park
2026-09-09 6:36 ` SJ Park
2026-09-09 6:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 20:26 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909040249.243941F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.