All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/12] bpf: Recognize by-value struct and __int128 kfunc arguments
Date: Tue,  8 Sep 2026 23:25:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909062554.4007131-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909062522.4001896-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>

A kfunc taking a struct or union by value is rejected today, and one
taking an __int128 is accepted but mis-counted:

  Unrecognized R2 type STRUCT

The kfunc arguments walk the same slot as a BPF-to-BPF call:
one argument register per eightbyte, and a 16-byte value takes two.
The outgoing stack argument count at the call site follows the slots for
the same reason. Similar to BPF-to-BPF aggregate handling, a kfunc
aggregate argument is only supported when it is composed of scalars.
Everything that maps a kfunc argument to a register has to follow the
slots too.

An argument of a single eightbyte lands in the same place under every
calling convention, so those are taken. The conventions the JIT has to
reconcile do not agree on where a larger one goes, so refuse it for now
with

  Function f arg#1 type INT cannot be passed at argument slot 1 on this
  architecture

which the next patch turns into an answer from the JIT. The paths that
handle a two-slot argument are therefore unreachable until then.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index cf526f28f3e5..94c359351bb6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -12154,12 +12154,30 @@ bool bpf_is_kfunc_pkt_changing(struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
 	return meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_xdp_pull_data];
 }
 
+static u32 kfunc_arg_slots(const struct btf_type *t)
+{
+	if (btf_type_is_int(t) || btf_type_is_struct(t))
+		return (t->size + BPF_REG_SIZE - 1) / BPF_REG_SIZE;
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static u32 kfunc_proto_slots(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *func_proto)
+{
+	const struct btf_param *args = btf_params(func_proto);
+	u32 i, nargs = btf_type_vlen(func_proto), slots_used = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
+		slots_used += kfunc_arg_slots(btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL));
+
+	return slots_used;
+}
+
 static int
 get_kfunc_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta,
-		   const struct btf_param *args, int arg, int nargs)
+		   const struct btf_param *args, int arg, int nargs, u32 slot)
 {
 	const struct btf_type *t, *ref_t = NULL;
-	argno_t argno = argno_from_arg(arg + 1);
+	argno_t argno = argno_from_arg(slot + 1);
 	const char *ref_tname = NULL;
 	int arg_type;
 
@@ -12179,6 +12197,23 @@ get_kfunc_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta,
 		return KF_ARG_ANYTHING;
 	}
 
+	if (btf_type_is_struct(t)) {
+		if (!t->size || t->size > 2 * BPF_REG_SIZE) {
+			verbose(env,
+				"%s type %s has size %u, only 1 to %d bytes "
+				"can be passed by value\n",
+				reg_arg_name(env, argno), btf_type_str(t), t->size,
+				2 * BPF_REG_SIZE);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		if (!btf_type_is_scalar_struct(env, meta->btf, t)) {
+			verbose(env, "%s type %s is not composed of scalars\n",
+				reg_arg_name(env, argno), btf_type_str(t));
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		return KF_ARG_ANYTHING;
+	}
+
 	if (!btf_type_is_ptr(t)) {
 		verbose(env, "Unrecognized %s type %s\n",
 			reg_arg_name(env, argno), btf_type_str(t));
@@ -12294,7 +12329,7 @@ static int gen_kfunc_arg_proto(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg
 {
 	const struct btf *btf = meta->btf;
 	const struct btf_param *args;
-	u32 i, nargs;
+	u32 i, nargs, slots_used;
 	int arg_type;
 
 	args = (const struct btf_param *)(meta->func_proto + 1);
@@ -12310,19 +12345,44 @@ static int gen_kfunc_arg_proto(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) {
+	for (i = 0, slots_used = 0; i < nargs; i++) {
+		const struct btf_type *t;
+		u32 nslots;
+
+		t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
+		nslots = kfunc_arg_slots(t);
+		/*
+		 * The calling conventions the JIT has to reconcile do not
+		 * agree on where an argument of more than one eightbyte goes,
+		 * so refuse one until the JIT can say where this arch puts it.
+		 */
+		if (nslots > 1) {
+			verbose(env,
+				"Function %s arg#%d type %s cannot be passed at "
+				"argument slot %d on this architecture\n",
+				meta->func_name, i, btf_type_str(t), slots_used);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		slots_used += nslots;
+
 		if (is_kfunc_arg_prog_aux(btf, &args[i]) ||
 		    is_kfunc_arg_ignore(btf, &args[i]) ||
 		    is_kfunc_arg_implicit(meta, i))
 			continue;
 
-		arg_type = get_kfunc_arg_type(env, meta, args, i, nargs);
+		arg_type = get_kfunc_arg_type(env, meta, args, i, nargs, slots_used - nslots);
 		if (arg_type < 0)
 			return arg_type;
 
 		proto->arg_type[i] = arg_type;
 	}
 
+	if (slots_used > MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS && !bpf_jit_supports_stack_args()) {
+		verbose(env, "JIT does not support kfunc %s() with %d argument slots\n",
+			meta->func_name, slots_used);
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -12897,29 +12957,35 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_me
 	const struct btf *btf = meta->btf;
 	const struct btf_param *args;
 	struct btf_record *rec;
-	u32 i, nargs;
+	u32 i, k, nargs, proto_slots, slots_used, prev_slot = 0, nslots = 0;
 	int ret;
 
 	args = (const struct btf_param *)(meta->func_proto + 1);
 	nargs = btf_type_vlen(meta->func_proto);
+	proto_slots = kfunc_proto_slots(btf, meta->func_proto);
 
-	ret = check_outgoing_stack_args(env, caller, nargs, func_name, btf, args);
+	ret = check_outgoing_stack_args(env, caller, proto_slots, func_name, btf,
+					proto_slots == nargs ? args : NULL);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	/* Check that BTF function arguments match actual types that the
 	 * verifier sees.
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) {
-		struct bpf_reg_state *reg = get_func_arg_reg(caller, regs, i);
+	for (i = 0, slots_used = 0; i < nargs;
+	     i++, prev_slot = slots_used, slots_used += nslots) {
+		struct bpf_reg_state *reg = get_func_arg_reg(caller, regs, slots_used);
 		const struct btf_type *t, *ref_t, *resolve_ret;
 		enum bpf_arg_type arg_type = ARG_DONTCARE;
-		argno_t argno = argno_from_arg(i + 1);
+		argno_t argno = argno_from_arg(slots_used + 1);
 		int regno = reg_from_argno(argno);
 		bool btf_id_fixed_off_ok = true;
 		u32 ref_id = args[i].type, type_size;
 		int kf_arg_type = meta->fn->arg_type[i];
 
+		t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
+		nslots = kfunc_arg_slots(t);
+
 		if (is_kfunc_arg_prog_aux(btf, &args[i])) {
 			/* Reject repeated use bpf_prog_aux */
 			if (meta->arg_prog) {
@@ -12939,8 +13005,6 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_me
 		if (is_kfunc_arg_ignore(btf, &args[i]) || is_kfunc_arg_implicit(meta, i))
 			continue;
 
-		t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
-
 		if (btf_type_is_ptr(t)) {
 			ref_t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, t->type, &ref_id);
 			ref_tname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, ref_t->name_off);
@@ -12991,6 +13055,27 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_me
 			ref_tname = btf_name_by_offset(btf, ref_t->name_off);
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * The first register is checked in below KF_ARG_ANYTHING.
+		 * The rest of it has to be a scalar.
+		 */
+		for (k = 1; k < nslots; k++) {
+			argno_t hi_argno = argno_from_arg(slots_used + k + 1);
+			struct bpf_reg_state *hi = get_func_arg_reg(caller, regs, slots_used + k);
+
+			if (hi->type != SCALAR_VALUE) {
+				verbose(env, "%s is not a scalar\n", reg_arg_name(env, hi_argno));
+				bpf_diag_call_arg_fmt(env, insn_idx, hi_argno, func_name,
+						      "Pass an integer scalar value for this "
+						      "argument, not a pointer or resource object.",
+						      "the kfunc expects an integer scalar, "
+						      "but %s is %s",
+						      reg_arg_name(env, hi_argno),
+						      bpf_diag_reg_type_plain(env, hi->type));
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+		}
+
 		switch (base_type(kf_arg_type)) {
 		case KF_ARG_CONST:
 		case KF_ARG_CONST_MEM_SIZE:
@@ -13408,9 +13493,9 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_me
 			fallthrough;
 		case KF_ARG_MEM_SIZE:
 		{
-			struct bpf_reg_state *buff_reg = get_func_arg_reg(caller, regs, i - 1);
+			struct bpf_reg_state *buff_reg = get_func_arg_reg(caller, regs, prev_slot);
 			struct bpf_reg_state *size_reg = reg;
-			argno_t buff_argno = argno_from_arg(i);
+			argno_t buff_argno = argno_from_arg(prev_slot + 1);
 			enum bpf_mem_size_failure failure;
 
 			if (reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE) {
@@ -13756,7 +13841,7 @@ s64 bpf_kfunc_stack_access_bytes(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *
 	const struct btf_param *args;
 	const struct btf_type *t, *ref_t;
 	const struct btf *btf;
-	u32 nargs, type_size;
+	u32 i, slot, nargs, type_size;
 	s64 size;
 
 	if (bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta(env, insn->imm, insn->off, &meta) < 0)
@@ -13765,23 +13850,32 @@ s64 bpf_kfunc_stack_access_bytes(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *
 	btf = meta.btf;
 	args = btf_params(meta.func_proto);
 	nargs = btf_type_vlen(meta.func_proto);
-	if (arg >= nargs)
+
+	/*
+	 * @arg is an argument slot and a 16-byte parameter takes two of them,
+	 * so walk the parameters to find the one that starts at this slot. A
+	 * slot holding the upper eightbyte of such a parameter belongs to no
+	 * pointer, and neither does a slot past the last parameter.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0, slot = 0; i < nargs && slot < arg; i++)
+		slot += kfunc_arg_slots(btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL));
+	if (i >= nargs || slot != arg)
 		return 0;
 
-	t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[arg].type, NULL);
+	t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
 	if (!btf_type_is_ptr(t))
 		return 0;
 
 	/* dynptr: fixed 16-byte on-stack representation */
-	if (is_kfunc_arg_dynptr(btf, &args[arg])) {
+	if (is_kfunc_arg_dynptr(btf, &args[i])) {
 		size = BPF_DYNPTR_SIZE;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
 	/* ptr + __sz/__szk pair: size is in the next register */
-	if (arg + 1 < nargs &&
-	    (btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[arg + 1], "__sz") ||
-	     btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[arg + 1], "__szk"))) {
+	if (i + 1 < nargs &&
+	    (btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[i + 1], "__sz") ||
+	     btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[i + 1], "__szk"))) {
 		int size_reg = BPF_REG_1 + arg + 1;
 
 		if (aux->const_reg_mask & BIT(size_reg)) {
@@ -13803,7 +13897,7 @@ s64 bpf_kfunc_stack_access_bytes(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *
 	/* KF_ITER_NEW kfuncs initialize the iterator state at arg 0 */
 	if (arg == 0 && meta.kfunc_flags & KF_ITER_NEW)
 		return -size;
-	if (is_kfunc_arg_uninit(btf, &args[arg]))
+	if (is_kfunc_arg_uninit(btf, &args[i]))
 		return -size;
 	return size;
 }
@@ -13996,7 +14090,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *insn_aux;
 	const char *operation;
 	int err, insn_idx = *insn_idx_p;
-	u32 i, nargs, ptr_type_id, ret_nregs = 1;
+	u32 i, proto_slots, ptr_type_id, ret_nregs = 1;
 	struct bpf_kfunc_desc *desc;
 	struct btf *desc_btf;
 	int id;
@@ -14422,11 +14516,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	if (bpf_is_kfunc_pkt_changing(&meta))
 		clear_all_pkt_pointers(env);
 
-	nargs = btf_type_vlen(meta.func_proto);
-	if (nargs > MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS) {
+	proto_slots = kfunc_proto_slots(desc_btf, meta.func_proto);
+	if (proto_slots > MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS) {
 		struct bpf_func_state *caller = cur_func(env);
 		struct bpf_subprog_info *caller_info = &env->subprog_info[caller->subprogno];
-		u16 out_stack_arg_cnt = nargs - MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS;
+		u16 out_stack_arg_cnt = proto_slots - MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS;
 		u16 stack_arg_cnt = bpf_in_stack_arg_cnt(caller_info) + out_stack_arg_cnt;
 
 		if (stack_arg_cnt > caller_info->stack_arg_cnt)
@@ -17993,7 +18087,7 @@ bool bpf_get_call_summary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *call,
 		if (err < 0)
 			/* error would be reported later */
 			return false;
-		cs->arg_slot_cnt = btf_type_vlen(meta.func_proto);
+		cs->arg_slot_cnt = kfunc_proto_slots(meta.btf, meta.func_proto);
 		cs->fastcall = meta.kfunc_flags & KF_FASTCALL;
 		cs->is_void = btf_type_is_void(btf_type_by_id(meta.btf, meta.func_proto->type));
 		return true;
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09  6:25 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/12] bpf: Support by-value struct and __int128 arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/12] selftests/bpf: Add a test for an __int128 by-value argument Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  7:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11  4:25     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/12] bpf: Index global function arguments by argument slot Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  7:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11  4:27     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/12] bpf: Support by-value struct arguments up to 16 bytes Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  7:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11  4:29     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/12] bpf: Support __int128 as a by-value function argument Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/12] bpf: Rename bpf_call_summary::num_params to arg_slot_cnt Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:25 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-09-09  6:46   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/12] bpf: Recognize by-value struct and __int128 kfunc arguments sashiko-bot
2026-09-11  4:31     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:25 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/12] bpf: Prepare kfunc arguments for the JIT from an ABI description Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11  5:05     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/12] bpf, x86: Move kfunc arguments into the x86-64 calling convention Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  7:29   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11  5:32     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/12] bpf, arm64: Move kfunc arguments into the arm64 " Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  7:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11  5:34     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/12] selftests/bpf: Add C tests for by-value arguments up to 16 bytes Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/12] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm tests for by-value arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  7:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11  5:37     ` Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  6:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for by-value kfunc arguments Yonghong Song
2026-09-09  7:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-11  5:57     ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909062554.4007131-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.