From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
To: john <love_goo@163.com>
Cc: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, liuye@kylinos.cn, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
hughd@google.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, zhangqiuhao@huawei.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, mawupeng1@huwei.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 2/2] mm: vmscan: stop scanning ineligible folios after max_nr_skipped
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 17:56:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909095629.2523075-1-kunwu.chan@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901084706.3784449-3-love_goo@163.com>
On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 16:47:06 +0800 john <love_goo@163.com> wrote:
> From: Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
>
> When reclaiming for a lower zone, isolate_lru_folios() accounts folios
> from higher zones as skipped and, once max_nr_skipped hits
> SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX_SKIPPED, force-isolates the remaining ineligible folios
> to keep the loop from spinning on the skipped ones. Those folios are
> reclaimed even though they can never satisfy the current allocation, so
> nr_reclaimed is inflated into a false progress that keeps resetting
> no_progress_loops in should_reclaim_retry() and delays the OOM.
>
> Stop scanning once max_nr_skipped is reached instead of force-isolating
> the ineligible folios. The skipped folios are already accounted in
> total_scan, so shrink_lruvec() can charge the overshoot against its scan
> budget (see the previous commit) and will not rescan them.
>
> Fixes: 1c7b17cf0594 ("mm/vmscan: fix hard LOCKUP in function isolate_lru_folios")
> Signed-off-by: Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 823af9e86efd3..375f7cd5aa441 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1701,12 +1701,20 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> total_scan += nr_pages;
>
> - /* Using max_nr_skipped to prevent hard LOCKUP*/
> - if (max_nr_skipped < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX_SKIPPED &&
> - (folio_zonenum(folio) > sc->reclaim_idx)) {
> + /*
> + * Using max_nr_skipped to prevent hard LOCKUP.
> + * Once the cap is hit, stop rather than force-isolating:
> + * reclaiming ineligible folios only inflates nr_reclaimed
> + * into a false progress.
> + */
> + if (folio_zonenum(folio) > sc->reclaim_idx) {
> nr_skipped[folio_zonenum(folio)] += nr_pages;
> - move_to = &folios_skipped;
> max_nr_skipped++;
> + if (max_nr_skipped >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX_SKIPPED) {
> + list_move(&folio->lru, &folios_skipped);
> + break;
One question about stopping the scan once max_nr_skipped reaches
SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX_SKIPPED.
Previously, reaching this limit caused the remaining ineligible folios
to be force-isolated so that the scanner would not keep looping on skipped
folios. With this change, we break out of isolate_lru_folios() instead.
Could this cause us to stop before reaching eligible folios later in the LRU?
Is SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX_SKIPPED intended to be sufficient to determine that
continuing the scan cannot make useful reclaim progress?
Thanks,
KunWu
> + }
> + move_to = &folios_skipped;
> goto move;
> }
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 8:47 [PATCH resend 0/2] mm: vmscan: fix scan overshoot and ineligible folio scanning john
2026-09-01 8:47 ` [PATCH resend 1/2] mm: vmscan: charge isolate overshoot against scan quota john
2026-09-09 9:52 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-09-01 8:47 ` [PATCH resend 2/2] mm: vmscan: stop scanning ineligible folios after max_nr_skipped john
2026-09-09 9:56 ` Kunwu Chan [this message]
2026-09-08 1:49 ` [PATCH resend 0/2] mm: vmscan: fix scan overshoot and ineligible folio scanning john
2026-09-09 2:11 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909095629.2523075-1-kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--to=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuye@kylinos.cn \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=love_goo@163.com \
--cc=mawupeng1@huawei.com \
--cc=mawupeng1@huwei.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=zhangqiuhao@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.