From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.18.y] ring-buffer: Make cpu_buffer::free_page a buffer_data_read_page
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 06:11:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909101135.1461760-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026090315-spinout-ditto-bd8b@gregkh>
From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
[ Upstream commit 7a1fb95de5404134f8758c1295ce88986bdf117c ]
Discarding a cached reader page after a concurrent ring buffer resize
uses the new global subbuf_order for the free_pages() call. This
mismatched order may crashes the kernel or leaks memory because the cached
page was allocated under the old size.
Save the actual free_page order alongside the page address to ensure we
always refer to the correct value and do not rely on the potentially
stalled cpu_buffer->subbuf_order value. The simplest is to make
free_page a buffer_data_read_page which already covers exactly what we
need: a page address and a page order.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260813131152.3589632-4-vdonnefort@google.com
Fixes: 8e7b58c27b3c ("ring-buffer: Just update the subbuffers when changing their allocation order")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
[ Changed upstream’s dpage variable to bpage in ring_buffer_free_read_page(). ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 5936389188bd7..31c7ef21b526a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ struct ring_buffer_per_cpu {
raw_spinlock_t reader_lock; /* serialize readers */
arch_spinlock_t lock;
struct lock_class_key lock_key;
- struct buffer_data_page *free_page;
+ struct buffer_data_read_page free_page;
unsigned long nr_pages;
unsigned int current_context;
struct list_head *pages;
@@ -2514,7 +2514,7 @@ static void rb_free_cpu_buffer(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
free_buffer_page(bpage);
}
- free_pages((unsigned long)cpu_buffer->free_page, cpu_buffer->buffer->subbuf_order);
+ free_pages((unsigned long)cpu_buffer->free_page.data, cpu_buffer->free_page.order);
kfree(cpu_buffer);
}
@@ -6570,9 +6570,9 @@ ring_buffer_alloc_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
local_irq_save(flags);
arch_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
- if (cpu_buffer->free_page) {
- bpage->data = cpu_buffer->free_page;
- cpu_buffer->free_page = NULL;
+ if (cpu_buffer->free_page.data) {
+ *bpage = cpu_buffer->free_page;
+ cpu_buffer->free_page.data = NULL;
}
arch_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
@@ -6624,8 +6624,8 @@ void ring_buffer_free_read_page(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
local_irq_save(flags);
arch_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
- if (!cpu_buffer->free_page) {
- cpu_buffer->free_page = bpage;
+ if (!cpu_buffer->free_page.data) {
+ cpu_buffer->free_page = *data_page;
bpage = NULL;
}
@@ -6978,7 +6978,7 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
}
for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
- struct buffer_data_page *old_free_data_page;
+ struct buffer_data_read_page old_free_data_page;
struct list_head old_pages;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -7021,7 +7021,7 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
arch_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
old_free_data_page = cpu_buffer->free_page;
- cpu_buffer->free_page = NULL;
+ cpu_buffer->free_page.data = NULL;
arch_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
rb_head_page_activate(cpu_buffer);
@@ -7033,7 +7033,7 @@ int ring_buffer_subbuf_order_set(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int order)
list_del_init(&bpage->list);
free_buffer_page(bpage);
}
- free_pages((unsigned long)old_free_data_page, old_order);
+ free_pages((unsigned long)old_free_data_page.data, old_free_data_page.order);
rb_check_pages(cpu_buffer);
}
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 14:23 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ring-buffer: Make cpu_buffer::free_page a" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-09 10:11 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909101135.1461760-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.