From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Naoya Horiguchi" <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
"Miaohe Lin" <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
kas@kernel.org, "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Brendan Jackman" <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
"Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: rmikey@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com,
harry@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: add the LINUX_EFI_POISONED_MEMORY configuration table
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 13:13:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909131331.1BECD1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909-hwpoison-kho-v4-1-359313564495@debian.org>
> Hardware-poisoned page frames are tracked only in the running kernel's
> data structures, so a kexec loses them and the next kernel doesn't have
> this information, thus, tripping into them again.
>
> Add an EFI configuration table to carry that information across kexec.
>
> It is a bitmap with one bit per EFI_POISON_UNIT_SIZE (2MiB) of physical
> memory starting at phys_base, modeled on the LINUX_EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
> table, and it rides the EFI system table to every kernel in the chain.
> Basing the bitmap keeps a machine whose RAM starts high from paying for
> the hole below it.
>
> List the table in the x86 efi_tables[] too, so an SME host maps it
> unencrypted like every other EFI table.
>
> The Kconfig symbol has no prompt. There is nothing for a user to decide,
> so it is on wherever it can be, and it only costs 64K per TiB of RAM on
> a kernel that already has the EFI stub and MEMORY_FAILURE. It is
> restricted to 64BIT because the unit arithmetic would need div_u64() on
> 32-bit, and there is no 32-bit EFI configuration with MEMORY_FAILURE to
> test that on.
>
> This is a similar approach as used as unaccepted memory.
>
> Suggested-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909-hwpoison-kho-v4-0-359313564495@debian.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 13:05 [PATCH v4 0/5] mm/memory-failure: keep hardware-poisoned pages out of the next kexec Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: add the LINUX_EFI_POISONED_MEMORY configuration table Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mm/memory-failure: libstub: install the poisoned-memory EFI table Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 14:00 ` Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 14:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-09-10 13:11 ` Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: record hardware-poisoned frames into the poisoned-memory table Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 14:05 ` Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/memory-failure: efi: answer whether a range is poisoned Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mm/memory-failure: keep inherited poisoned frames out of the buddy allocator Breno Leitao
2026-09-09 13:24 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909131331.1BECD1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rmikey@meta.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.