From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:00:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909160051.A12C61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909154739.1515514-27-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unconditional sysfs `mmap` support allows userspace to bypass hardware synchronization and power management.
--
commit 7fda3c54de1f0a266f9aa7c8acdc3ab9ae36340e
Author: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Subject: platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks
A callback indicates that the parent driver is responsible for accessing
the data area, making a PMT memory remap redundant. This commit skips
creating a remap if a read_telem callback has been provided.
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> index 402d51df834a6..1c7a372b4fc42 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -403,14 +403,19 @@ static int intel_pmt_dev_register(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry,
> if (!entry->size)
> return 0;
>
> - res.start = entry->base_addr;
> - res.end = res.start + entry->size - 1;
> - res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> + /*
> + * The read_telem callback is responsible for this mapping, and may have
> + * different requirements for use. If the callback is present do not
> + * create the map.
> + */
> + if (!(entry->cb && entry->cb->read_telem)) {
> + struct resource res = DEFINE_RES_MEM(entry->base_addr, entry->size);
>
> - entry->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
> - if (IS_ERR(entry->base)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(entry->base);
> - goto fail_ioremap;
> + entry->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
> + if (IS_ERR(entry->base)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(entry->base);
> + goto fail_ioremap;
> + }
> }
>
> sysfs_bin_attr_init(&entry->pmt_bin_attr);
> entry->pmt_bin_attr.attr.name = ns->name;
> entry->pmt_bin_attr.attr.mode = 0440;
> entry->pmt_bin_attr.mmap = intel_pmt_mmap;
[Severity: High]
Does unconditionally assigning intel_pmt_mmap in intel_pmt_dev_register() allow
userspace to bypass the read_telem callback requirements?
Since intel_pmt_mmap() in drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c directly maps
the physical BAR memory into userspace:
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c:intel_pmt_mmap() {
...
if (io_remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, pfn, vsize, vma->vm_page_prot))
...
}
any process with read permissions can mmap the sysfs attribute. If the process
then reads this mapping, won't it entirely bypass the parent driver's power
management (like xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active) and hardware synchronization?
If the device is in a low-power state, an unpowered MMIO read might cause a
system-level PCIe bus hang, or read corrupt state if the SoC re-mapper is not
configured.
Should mmap support on the sysfs attribute be disabled when a read_telem
callback is present?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909154739.1515514-22-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-09 15:47 [PATCH v7 00/20] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 01/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 02/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rmw with a return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 03/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rc " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 04/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 06/20] drm/xe/vsec: Do not register BMG PMT for VF Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 07/20] drm/xe/vsec: Correct locking order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 08/20] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 09/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add DOC text for VSEC Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 10/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 11/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor BattleMage PMT defines Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 12/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support EAGAIN return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 20:01 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 13/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add base_offset to allow for more flexibilty Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 20:03 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 14/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 15/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 16/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 17/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 16:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 18/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add PMT GUID internal access Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-10 18:55 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 19/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update PMT " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:47 ` [PATCH v7 20/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor platform check Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-09 15:56 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Crescent Island PMT support (rev9) Patchwork
2026-09-09 15:57 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909160051.A12C61F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.