From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "HE WEI(ギカク)" <skyexpoc@gmail.com>,
"Konstantin Komarov" <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>,
"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 4/4] fs/ntfs3: fix slab-out-of-bounds write in ni_create_attr_list()
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 21:26:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910012610.3866859-4-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910012610.3866859-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: HE WEI(ギカク) <skyexpoc@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit 7c4841e2a62794a3bab7c1ff0540580f387e377f ]
ni_create_attr_list() allocates a fixed buffer of al_aligned(record_size)
(== record_size) bytes and then walks every attribute of the primary MFT
record, writing one ATTR_LIST_ENTRY per attribute and advancing the cursor
by le_size(name_len), with no check against the end of the buffer; the
total size is only computed after the loop.
A minimum-size resident attribute occupies SIZEOF_RESIDENT (0x18 = 24)
bytes on disk, but an unnamed attribute expands to le_size(0) (0x20 = 32)
bytes in the list. Because the number of attributes in a record is not
bounded (mi_enum_attr() accepts arbitrarily many equal-type, nameless
minimum-size attributes), a crafted record packed with such attributes
produces a list larger than record_size and overflows the heap buffer.
This is reachable from a crafted, loop-mounted NTFS image: opening the file
and adding an attribute (e.g. via setxattr) drives ntfs_set_ea() ->
ni_insert_resident() -> ni_insert_attr() -> ni_ins_attr_ext() ->
ni_create_attr_list().
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ni_create_attr_list+0xc48/0x1058
Write of size 4 at addr ffff000008984c00 by task setfattr/345
ni_create_attr_list+0xc48/0x1058
ni_ins_attr_ext+0x510/0x7c0
ni_insert_attr+0x3f8/0x70c
ni_insert_resident+0xc8/0x3b0
ntfs_set_ea+0x66c/0xd28
ntfs_setxattr+0x4d8/0x5b0
__arm64_sys_setxattr+0xa4/0x124
Allocated by task 345:
ni_create_attr_list+0x188/0x1058
The buggy address belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024
(the write lands at object+1024).
Size the buffer from the actual attributes instead of assuming a single
record_size is always enough.
Fixes: 4342306f0f0d ("fs/ntfs3: Add file operations and implementation")
Reported-by: HE WEI(ギカク) <skyexpoc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: HE WEI(ギカク) <skyexpoc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/ntfs3/frecord.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/frecord.c b/fs/ntfs3/frecord.c
index 162a6c038000e..45e8d73d38f8f 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs3/frecord.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs3/frecord.c
@@ -823,10 +823,23 @@ int ni_create_attr_list(struct ntfs_inode *ni)
rs = sbi->record_size;
/*
- * Skip estimating exact memory requirement.
- * Looks like one record_size is always enough.
+ * Compute the exact size of the attribute list. Each attribute in the
+ * record yields one ATTR_LIST_ENTRY of le_size(name_len) bytes. The
+ * minimum on-disk attribute is SIZEOF_RESIDENT (0x18) bytes, but an
+ * unnamed one expands to le_size(0) (0x20) here, so a record crafted
+ * with many such attributes needs more than a single record_size; the
+ * previous fixed kzalloc(record_size) could therefore be overflowed by
+ * an attacker-controlled record.
*/
- le = kzalloc(al_aligned(rs), GFP_NOFS);
+ lsize = 0;
+ attr = NULL;
+ while ((attr = mi_enum_attr(ni, &ni->mi, attr)))
+ lsize += le_size(attr->name_len);
+
+ if (!lsize)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ le = kzalloc(al_aligned(lsize), GFP_NOFS);
if (!le)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -836,7 +849,6 @@ int ni_create_attr_list(struct ntfs_inode *ni)
attr = NULL;
nb = 0;
free_b = 0;
- attr = NULL;
for (; (attr = mi_enum_attr(ni, &ni->mi, attr)); le = Add2Ptr(le, sz)) {
sz = le_size(attr->name_len);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 10:01 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fs/ntfs3: fix slab-out-of-bounds write in" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-10 1:26 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/4] fs/ntfs3: Add more checks in mi_enum_attr (part 2) Sasha Levin
2026-09-10 1:26 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/4] fs/ntfs3: Mark inode as bad as soon as error detected in mi_enum_attr() Sasha Levin
2026-09-10 1:26 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/4] fs/ntfs3: fix KMSAN uninit-value in ni_create_attr_list Sasha Levin
2026-09-10 1:26 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-09-30 13:45 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/4] fs/ntfs3: Add more checks in mi_enum_attr (part 2) Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910012610.3866859-4-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
--cc=skyexpoc@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.