From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E2543C09F8 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789035013; cv=none; b=INDJk6UDgCYbjBHLyQY6gn8+lJ5tP6fyxgqddp3JXpIp77rYAUB0avIzWGexEH4yuEr9HYhT6Md0bPuNIaN+19jILgrKAzmg1ewLZbn1ymwXrPwQkKPL9mzpYz7WFLzb0PiytUZiRZetTIjW77lqJvKGmlCFANxqZ9g/O418NTk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789035013; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sYSG7l/Pl2UbsZ0TPVbTkcynEBpTEGZPvCF5eMZJn8s=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=PnK5srHVMmk7Du/AKN+hv4nXnCIjEDdBDWTZ756OGo62PBnUlDVXCbTw2IOa4zWOZD45MwElw4ShOOHJ95AqDdhkAgpojMr34QTkJKhLX54lKSYCFCpGzuQUKPWeKaMOXZ9csFof3wNw6Ared1o15CPTNRYLaS+CO5QhxDJrHuo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LkgPRphy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LkgPRphy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 747DA1F000FF; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:10:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789035005; bh=sYSG7l/Pl2UbsZ0TPVbTkcynEBpTEGZPvCF5eMZJn8s=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=LkgPRphyYdqSK2V4kiEaZQIxcW3eWgcUgJo3iVgYm/k63hYre9CNIjZuIunmyUDWv 5+xYUJGMC68hbE23Nh/JGgbUavvVMj/y0UYbMhfli/sommFeMtfQf6iFdJuC8ya4q2 fvaxZBvTiw4Qdlg2tjTrqNIpzUyV2xQqUP1YvTO7bqckFR0MpaFoO3WXY5z0RbYjrD YokxQBZveh6g5+0sHX3hUjC7GvMVOP3ja1aJXVGnnPYPdiXAKXPws0VAia35ZRazC3 FHXFi6YIoLXKSiBusaHEXrG220bP1kIaCqni70FkGgJ26v3eoPEpVezLMvfxuJ+TuM Z83RWOMNM4YOQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: set awu_max_opt to awu_max Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Pankaj Raghav" Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu In-Reply-To: <20260910100829.2532894-1-p.raghav@samsung.com> References: <20260910100829.2532894-1-p.raghav@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:10:04 +0000 Message-Id: <20260910101005.747DA1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > commit 5d894321c49e ("fs: add atomic write unit max opt to statx") > added atomic write max optimal to statx. As XFS can support large atomic > writes through SW, max_opt exposes the value that will be HW accelerated > atomics. >=20 > As ext4 does not support SW atomics, set awu_max_opt to awu_max. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260910100829.2532= 894-1-p.raghav@samsung.com?part=3D1