From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ernest Van Hoecke" <ernestvanhoecke@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow GPIO nexus maps
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 14:28:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910142819.DFA381F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910-fw-devlink-nexus-ready-v2-1-17ac82dbe226@toradex.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Stack buffer overflow when parsing `#<stem>-cells` property.
- [High] Infinite loop during device tree map traversal.
--
commit 07389d4c4496496ba5a738fbae28d5c3df4427f8
Author: Ernest Van Hoecke <ernest.vanhoecke@toradex.com>
of: property: fw_devlink: Follow GPIO nexus maps
This commit modifies fw_devlink to parse GPIO properties using a map-aware
parser instead of direct phandle references. This ensures fw_devlink resolves
the same provider as the GPIO consumer API, properly deferring consumers until
the nexus translation node is available.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/juuc4af7ndbajcl7gzf4tg5qz2q2j5tt3rvql4jbauradujrre@gc5nbdhhixaf/
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 72cf12907de03..380df0861ab97 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1311,6 +1311,19 @@ static struct device_node *parse_prop_cells(struct device_node *np,
> return sup_args.np;
> }
>
> +static struct device_node *parse_nexus_prop(struct device_node *np,
> + const char *prop_name, int index,
> + const char *stem_name)
> +{
> + struct of_phandle_args sup_args;
> +
> + if (of_parse_phandle_with_args_map(np, prop_name, stem_name, index,
> + &sup_args))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return sup_args.np;
> +}
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but by using of_parse_phandle_with_args_map()
during early boot for all -gpio(s) properties, does this expose a stack
buffer overflow to malformed Device Trees?
Looking at of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() in drivers/of/base.c, it reads
list_size from a Device Tree property (e.g., #gpio-cells) without checking
if it exceeds MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS:
drivers/of/base.c:of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() {
...
ret = of_property_read_u32(cur, cells_name, &list_size);
if (ret < 0)
goto put;
/* Precalculate the match array - this simplifies match loop */
for (i = 0; i < list_size; i++)
initial_match_array[i] = cpu_to_be32(out_args->args[i]);
...
}
If a malformed DT provides a cells property greater than 16, this loop will
read past the end of out_args->args and write past the end of the
initial_match_array stack buffer. Can this lead to memory corruption or a
kernel panic during early boot?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does calling
of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() here also expose an infinite loop when
traversing cyclic maps?
Looking at the map traversal loop in of_parse_phandle_with_args_map():
drivers/of/base.c:of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() {
...
while (cur) {
/* Get the <list>-map property */
map = of_get_property(cur, map_name, &map_len);
...
/* Iterate again with new provider */
out_args->np = new;
of_node_put(cur);
cur = new;
new = NULL;
}
...
}
Since there is no depth limit or cycle detection, if a Device Tree has a
cyclic map structure (where Node A maps to Node B, which maps back to Node A),
will this loop hang infinitely and cause a hard lockup?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260910-fw-devlink-nexus-ready-v2-0-17ac82dbe226@toradex.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 14:16 [PATCH v2 0/7] of: property: Make fw_devlink follow GPIO, PWM and clock nexus maps Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow GPIO " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-11 7:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Report unsupported supplier linking Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with GPIO nexus maps Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-11 7:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow PWM " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow clock " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with " Ernest Van Hoecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910142819.DFA381F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ernestvanhoecke@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.