From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32D802D7DD7 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 06:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.154 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789021028; cv=none; b=sgJpF8qiqJI+53mOUmphriveRXYeef0nwV0duGMo4KZKZqRl1gZa1/X0IMmAdaGF5iq+vVLOV9QZIhkJxPXTs0ovdydN6si1WfjZ3s4DfXBgirC/f2ZREZS9dpdSjIEnUpqZA5Wlz3LRczTTil8PhCkpfG+lfWOpNZnnu+til+U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789021028; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ax7iAItCZxhp4U77ALZrLCStzQORbjOVlFCPe8cAHxA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FU7ectZ9VEfjxLUf15fu57GaogGauG0PFOMfauM6R2KKOgFIcrov/vO9sQ5qk0XJ6POQcoOQhmdM1/+ZCEUqXa0skDUbvNjQxmeJzIeI0+W71L2ajANlVPCo1XM68KhqjYGOBo2dj4OudqPx5hQCEpYlXs5HnpSpkU4K7kGQnbk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kroah.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b=HmZPtklR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=xLxhpp7P; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.154 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kroah.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b="HmZPtklR"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="xLxhpp7P" Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118F514000EC; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 02:17:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Sep 2026 02:17:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1789021021; x=1789107421; bh=xFWtt2eHg+ oZnfJ3PfjUfyENZxtN7vqiiamMOKqGF74=; b=HmZPtklR4A9knrQOOcBqn6G2Ar c7WatLkg73f8w6KW4hP2+iPxHB/JJJE1nk/DWrUxp5JO0viCxo0l1j1RhZJ/bKYD d7CTBYvlgSu2Y8Q0GNhsrkej8XJ45tGCtw6kE/Bn4nOtNoHzFYZ7As1hmdv9zfcd tro7ao3YMTMc+njrVBAwmM+Y8gxrcRFEt6hTwab23QSS6H5dDItQX7WCit23Cesu oguLfV0AXYm8JAcHitfTNnSYuLwMyTZ/tRsRrNhBNsWCJeXb2xVX7MrrkS9OFm0J 7SWWRIeeWDxrq5OGlCtNYSmCgus9IUpSdF3crc1JXzAfBwbAdTRX87at6lfQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1789021021; x=1789107421; bh=xFWtt2eHg+oZnfJ3PfjUfyENZxtN7vqiiam MOKqGF74=; b=xLxhpp7Pm2N1qN4TM7gpalt2ib0I8sebaWUsHOdym3vV+LYJ2/D 65/pH8gvoOQKbIOtAF7IOnvuAkggiNizmQ4T24pYapK+5RKXkdZfZII5ZOxK0q0G 7S28G4OWTtTbzxpNd0rXhOjHElK3dnNeN5/+2aWigBGFSVY4WG3sZ+gJwlpWdt4x pPGTOcODm0gSmK+pXw1xEEYbltwUriQgUYYSSt3NfXNIpxKEJ+k9HAaUawUaeJxl KEznM2y9GoThdujmxKbYoYVg2sP2XscimN9+Y4L4dXO+x6vp/O4iRkKYz5pDF2OM YTKaMsfKwehwG8b90Vn0WTdkDir0IfdUeWg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTG3nOssro9I0zqEyPaTpfkjsS1VYtxU9VsZgd4z++2dxU5uKj69mrC64FkeWFoQpf zHGGEJ3/3DmMaetFztzdnl11j83g/DBT9N7TOeaLG+e3IdPL/Lk4m7xHp0qt3koZH4AR8x IdTXvXTOeY8teVt0we3JFRFG/ezzUIkcPQGOJCYwdevX2GO/vSJoTb+mggbxwD91Bin5NK 3Z7wVZH2Pm/erWLmwH70K09feFejys1lICswGSPnrVlU5oYDM7GOMQCX2A1XYkX5o5C/7z yq2pvXoDRIM6dCLsrawicXuWjbbBqzTG/iVnFpBBEgT7aWm5u1+v7fH2N93Y7UKSq0oPXm 7WtBSjAycEZkPS0CV0frq7byZHIcfpty2GdxJxOKIsXtFwP7jGwOfv0e62HAZ1zUyeYtmt pV1FHsoiXG7XikLp0ykOLwwGYLt1fAU1pHrtVd29bSL8FiWv8v/6hYxE3b4wnuCg2G99qI zI2pz9+f3+Hl0T7N/RczZTvmv6EjCQR3A7SGlRdUioHslE7Dt52E5+f4vwCjWhzAe8+PpG dgR2SABxZqWVmeOpFk7hrg+uijJSXQwOTB+BiPJYrh6pXKt64g9Oge54JNQ0nebINI6c+u aVmXDhd4T2k4bRxY3S1hl6JPhBKCOpa3Whvtsk04jPQuhHfF2Z+fhkdBlWTg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i787e41f1:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 10 Sep 2026 02:17:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:15:05 +0200 From: Greg KH To: SJ Park Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, damon@lists.linux.dev, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 7.2.y] mm/damon/core: skip aging from repeated aggressive merging Message-ID: <2026091032-outright-varsity-64d9@gregkh> References: <2026090918-relic-padded-3b25@gregkh> <20260910010209.126591-1-sj@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: damon@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260910010209.126591-1-sj@kernel.org> On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 06:02:09PM -0700, SJ Park wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2026 14:19:27 +0200 Greg KH wrote: > [...] > > Does not apply to the latest 7.2.y queue :( > > Thank you, just rebased the patch to 7.2.5-rc1 and posted as another reply [1]. > > As number of stable patches for DAMON is increasing, this kind of patch > applying-order based conflict might be even more common in future. Maybe I > could reduce this kind of issues if I could post fixed patches as single patch > series, instead of replying to this kind of individual failure report. > > I was initially worried if your workflow is dependent to the guided workflow > (replying ported patch as a reply to each failure report), and hence if this > could make your job more difficult. But I know the stable patch submission > rules are quite flexible. And you may already have good enough automation for > such small change.s So as long as I keep the essential stable patches rule > (use 'cherry-pick -x' option and add target branch name as patch subject tag), > that might not really make your work worse? A patch series is great, and much simpler for me to apply, otherwise I have to just guess and go by the email date/time stamp to order them. thanks, greg k-h