All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@kernel.org>
Subject: CVE-2026-89768: fs: fix user path of nested backing files
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:47:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026091111-CVE-2026-89768-51e4@gregkh> (raw)

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@kernel.org>

Description
===========

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fs: fix user path of nested backing files

backing_file_open() derives the path to be stored in the new backing
file from user_file->f_path.  This is incorrect when user_file itself
is a backing file, which is the case for nested stacking filesystems,
e.g. overlayfs mounts where the lowerdir of one overlayfs is the merged
directory of another.  Since commit def3ae83da02 ("fs: store real path
instead of fake path in backing file f_path") the f_path of a backing
file holds the real path of the intermediate layer, not the path that
the user opened.

Commit 924577e4f6ca ("ovl: Fix nested backing file paths") fixed this
for such configurations by passing file_user_path() from
ovl_open_realfile().  However, commit 6af36aeb147a ("lsm: add
backing_file LSM hooks") changed the first argument of
backing_file_open() from the user path back to the user file and
derived the path from user_file->f_path again, silently re-introducing
the problem.

As a result, files mapped through a nested overlayfs show the wrong
path in /proc/<pid>/maps and in perf/ftrace mmap records.  For example,
with two nested overlayfs mounts:

  mkdir -p /ovl/{lower,upper,work,merged} /ovl/nested
  echo hello > /ovl/lower/foo
  mount -t overlay overlay \
	-o lowerdir=/ovl/lower,upperdir=/ovl/upper,workdir=/ovl/work \
	/ovl/merged
  # at least two lowerdirs are needed when upperdir is nonexistent
  mount -t overlay overlay \
	-o lowerdir=/ovl/merged:/ovl/lower /ovl/nested

mapping /ovl/nested/foo shows a disconnected path instead of the user
path:

  # readlink /proc/self/fd/3
  /ovl/nested/foo
  # grep foo /proc/self/maps
  7f6e2c100000-7f6e2c101000 r--s 00000000 00:24 15813027 /foo

The bogus path is derived from the f_path of the intermediate backing
file, whose mount is a private clone that d_path() cannot resolve.

Fix this by using file_user_path(), which returns the outermost
user-visible path for backing files and falls back to
&user_file->f_path for regular files.  This restores the behavior of
commit 924577e4f6ca ("ovl: Fix nested backing file paths") for
overlayfs and also fixes the same problem for the other
backing_file_open() callers, fuse passthrough and erofs ishare, when
their user file is itself a backing file.

backing_tmpfile_open() has the same pattern but is not affected: it is
only called by ovl_create_tmpfile() for the upper layer, and another
overlayfs is rejected as upperdir by the DCACHE_OP_REAL check in
ovl_mount_dir_check(), so its user_file can never be a backing file.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-89768 to this issue.


Affected and fixed versions
===========================

	Issue introduced in 6.12.95 with commit 5b6aa9a843205da92d860e5011a7b29062a76b8f and fixed in 6.12.109 with commit 88c927a63dc717b6d46b20fe13ea713916e49089
	Issue introduced in 6.18.38 with commit 5dfcb15974e7d0f96aca278dd9f1b85df91523ef and fixed in 6.18.50 with commit c03114634d342648bd34910aa8fb88007e92cc3c
	Issue introduced in 7.1 with commit 6af36aeb147a06dea47c49859cd6ca5659aeb987 and fixed in 7.2.4 with commit a35cc21355734e1acb89973d9be90ca8e4c3ed2f
	Issue introduced in 7.1 with commit 6af36aeb147a06dea47c49859cd6ca5659aeb987 and fixed in 7.3-rc1 with commit f2381b546e7e6a35c9fcee0d0ccb6c042a9aeb5d
	Issue introduced in 6.6.144 with commit 41c5b269af8b1f0bffcab7766a793f294ae6764e
	Issue introduced in 7.0.4 with commit 27e795afba0018b0ea9460dbad4bd706d1ba5ee0

Please see https://www.kernel.org for a full list of currently supported
kernel versions by the kernel community.

Unaffected versions might change over time as fixes are backported to
older supported kernel versions.  The official CVE entry at
	https://cve.org/CVERecord/?id=CVE-2026-89768
will be updated if fixes are backported, please check that for the most
up to date information about this issue.


Affected files
==============

The file(s) affected by this issue are:
	fs/backing-file.c


Mitigation
==========

The Linux kernel CVE team recommends that you update to the latest
stable kernel version for this, and many other bugfixes.  Individual
changes are never tested alone, but rather are part of a larger kernel
release.  Cherry-picking individual commits is not recommended or
supported by the Linux kernel community at all.  If however, updating to
the latest release is impossible, the individual changes to resolve this
issue can be found at these commits:
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88c927a63dc717b6d46b20fe13ea713916e49089
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c03114634d342648bd34910aa8fb88007e92cc3c
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a35cc21355734e1acb89973d9be90ca8e4c3ed2f
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2381b546e7e6a35c9fcee0d0ccb6c042a9aeb5d

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026091111-CVE-2026-89768-51e4@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=cve@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.