From: Salvatore Dipietro <dipiets@amazon.it>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <hch@infradead.org>, <abuehaze@amazon.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <alisaidi@amazon.com>,
<blakgeof@amazon.com>, <brauner@kernel.org>, <dgc@kernel.org>,
<dipietro.salvatore@gmail.com>, <dipiets@amazon.it>,
<djwong@kernel.org>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <jackmanb@google.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, <mhocko@suse.com>,
<ritesh.list@gmail.com>, <rvvandan@amazon.com>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <surenb@google.com>,
<vbabka@kernel.org>, <willy@infradead.org>, <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v5] mm/page_alloc: avoid direct compaction for costly __GFP_NORETRY allocations
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:21:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911142102.2294202-1-dipiets@amazon.it> (raw)
Commit 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace")
introduced high-order folio allocations in the iomap buffered write
path. When memory is fragmented, each failed costly-order allocation
enters __alloc_pages_slowpath() which runs direct compaction and
drain_all_pages(), causing a 0.38x throughput drop on PostgreSQL
pgbench (simple-update) with 1024 clients on a 96-vCPU arm64 system.
The root issue is that direct compaction is too expensive for hot
allocation paths that have fallbacks to smaller allocations.
__filemap_get_folio_mpol() already marks higher-order allocations with
__GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN, signalling that the caller can handle
failure. However, the page allocator still attempts full direct
compaction for costly orders with __GFP_NORETRY, which is unnecessarily
aggressive when the caller will simply retry at a lower order.
For costly-order allocations with __GFP_NORETRY, suppress direct reclaim
for the whole slowpath by computing can_direct_reclaim (and hence
can_compact) as false. The !can_direct_reclaim check near the top of
the slowpath then short-circuits to nopage: no direct reclaim, no direct
compaction and no drain_all_pages() IPI across every CPU. kswapd (and
in turn kcompactd) is still woken further down for background
defragmentation, so compaction keeps working for long-term system health
while being removed from the latency-critical direct allocation path.
Allocations that also request __GFP_THISNODE are exempted. That flag
pairing identifies the local-node-first THP attempt issued by
alloc_pages_mpol() (mempolicy.c), which relies on direct compaction to
form transparent huge pages. __GFP_NOFAIL is exempted as well, so a
must-not-fail allocation is never made to fail.
Test environment:
Hardware: AWS EC2 m8g.24xlarge (96 vCPU, arm64)
12x 1TB IO2 32000 IOPS RAID0 XFS
OS: AL2023
Kernel: v7.3-rc1
Database: PostgreSQL 18.4
Workload: pgbench simple-update, 1024 clients, 96 threads, 1200s
Results (average of 3 runs, TPS):
Config Avg TPS % vs baseline
AL2023 stock 6.1 kernel (pre-5d8edfb900d5) 136,942 n/a
v7.3-rc1 baseline (no patch) 59,408 -
v7.3-rc1 + this patch 161,994 +172.7%
The patch fully recovers the pre-5d8edfb900d5 performance, bringing
throughput back above the pre-regression level and well clear of the
~59k baseline. The AL2023 6.1 row runs a kernel that predates commit
5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace"), so it is not
directly comparable, but it shows the pre-regression level and confirms
that the ~59k baseline is the anomaly and not the norm.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260403193535.9970-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#t [v1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260420161404.642-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260710143437.12379-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v3]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260904115629.3993331-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v4]
Fixes: 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Salvatore Dipietro <dipiets@amazon.it>
---
v5: Derive the decision into a local flag instead of mutating gfp_mask
v4: Clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM early in the slowpath and exempt
__GFP_THISNODE so THP attempt keeps using direct compaction
v3: Move to mm/page_alloc.c, wake kcompactd instead of avoiding it
v2: Move from fs/iomap/buffered-io.c to mm/filemap.c
v1: Avoid compaction in iomap folio allocation
mm/page_alloc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 12fac9084c48..be8b0d72a2db 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4784,10 +4784,22 @@ static inline struct page *
__alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
struct alloc_context *ac)
{
- bool can_direct_reclaim = gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
+ const bool costly_order = order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER;
+ /*
+ * Costly __GFP_NORETRY callers have a cheap fallback to a lower order,
+ * so don't stall them in direct reclaim or direct compaction. Exempt
+ * __GFP_THISNODE (the THP attempt from alloc_pages_mpol() needs direct
+ * compaction) and __GFP_NOFAIL (must not be made to fail). Don't
+ * clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM from gfp_mask instead: that would also
+ * change the alloc_flags derived by alloc_flags_slowpath().
+ */
+ const bool costly_noretry = costly_order &&
+ (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY) &&
+ !(gfp_mask & (__GFP_THISNODE | __GFP_NOFAIL));
+ bool can_direct_reclaim = !costly_noretry &&
+ (gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM);
bool can_compact = can_direct_reclaim && gfp_compaction_allowed(gfp_mask);
bool nofail = gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL;
- const bool costly_order = order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER;
struct page *page = NULL;
unsigned int alloc_flags;
unsigned long did_some_progress;
--
2.50.1
AMAZON DEVELOPMENT CENTER ITALY SRL, viale Monte Grappa 3/5, 20124 Milano, Italia, Registro delle Imprese di Milano Monza Brianza Lodi REA n. 2504859, Capitale Sociale: 10.000 EUR i.v., Cod. Fisc. e P.IVA 10100050961, Societa con Socio Unico
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 14:21 Salvatore Dipietro [this message]
2026-09-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v5] mm/page_alloc: avoid direct compaction for costly __GFP_NORETRY allocations Zi Yan
2026-09-11 16:32 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-11 20:44 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911142102.2294202-1-dipiets@amazon.it \
--to=dipiets@amazon.it \
--cc=abuehaze@amazon.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alisaidi@amazon.com \
--cc=blakgeof@amazon.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=dipietro.salvatore@gmail.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rvvandan@amazon.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.