From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 06/15] io_uring: keep the tctx nodes on a list
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:40:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911154148.644489-7-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911154148.644489-1-axboe@kernel.dk>
tctx->xa is indexed by the ring pointer, which makes it a deep and
sparse xarray. Iterating it with xa_for_each() is expensive, 12 usec
for a single entry in testing. Keep the nodes on a list as well and
walk that instead, lookups by ring stay in the xarray.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 2 ++
io_uring/tctx.c | 10 ++++++----
io_uring/tctx.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
index 39629ee77b91..4af3d579ead6 100644
--- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
@@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ struct io_uring_task {
struct file *registered_rings[IO_RINGFD_REG_MAX];
struct xarray xa;
+ /* the nodes in ->xa, for walking without the xarray lookup cost */
+ struct list_head node_list;
struct wait_queue_head wait;
atomic_t in_cancel;
atomic_t inflight_tracked;
diff --git a/io_uring/tctx.c b/io_uring/tctx.c
index 466b7300e208..737dfad4a976 100644
--- a/io_uring/tctx.c
+++ b/io_uring/tctx.c
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ __cold struct io_uring_task *io_uring_alloc_task_context(struct task_struct *tas
tctx->task = task;
xa_init(&tctx->xa);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tctx->node_list);
init_waitqueue_head(&tctx->wait);
atomic_set(&tctx->in_cancel, 0);
atomic_set(&tctx->inflight_tracked, 0);
@@ -135,6 +136,7 @@ static int io_tctx_install_node(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
kfree(node);
return ret;
}
+ list_add(&node->tctx_link, &tctx->node_list);
mutex_lock(&ctx->tctx_lock);
list_add(&node->ctx_node, &ctx->tctx_list);
@@ -227,6 +229,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_del_tctx_node(unsigned long index)
WARN_ON_ONCE(current != node->task);
WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&node->ctx_node));
+ list_del(&node->tctx_link);
mutex_lock(&node->ctx->tctx_lock);
list_del(&node->ctx_node);
@@ -243,11 +246,10 @@ __cold void io_uring_del_tctx_node(unsigned long index)
__cold void io_uring_clean_tctx(struct io_uring_task *tctx)
{
struct io_wq *wq = tctx->io_wq;
- struct io_tctx_node *node;
- unsigned long index;
+ struct io_tctx_node *node, *tmp;
- xa_for_each(&tctx->xa, index, node) {
- io_uring_del_tctx_node(index);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(node, tmp, &tctx->node_list, tctx_link) {
+ io_uring_del_tctx_node((unsigned long)node->ctx);
cond_resched();
}
if (wq) {
diff --git a/io_uring/tctx.h b/io_uring/tctx.h
index 76ad1ad4594e..9a139816ce4f 100644
--- a/io_uring/tctx.h
+++ b/io_uring/tctx.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
struct io_tctx_node {
struct list_head ctx_node;
+ /* on tctx->node_list, only ever touched by the owning task */
+ struct list_head tctx_link;
struct task_struct *task;
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx;
};
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 15:40 [RFC PATCH 00/15] io_uring: thread identity handoff for blocking inline issue Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 01/15] kernel: add thread identity handoff Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched: call into io_uring when a PF_IO_HANDOFF task blocks Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 03/15] arm64: implement thread identity handoff Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 04/15] x86: " Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 05/15] io_uring/kbuf: use io_ring_submit_unlock() helper Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 07/15] io_uring: add uring_lock section depth tracking and blockable opdef flag Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 08/15] io_uring: split io_uring_enter() and io_submit_sqes() into helpers Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 09/15] io_uring: keep the submission plug on the io_submit_sqes() stack Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 10/15] io-wq: support handing a task identity to an idle worker Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 11/15] io_uring: enable handing submitter identity to an io-wq worker Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 12/15] io_uring: defer the identity migration to the end of the submission Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 13/15] io_uring: issue blockable requests inline in blocking mode Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 14/15] io_uring: add tracepoints for the handoff operation Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 15/15] io_uring: issue IOSQE_ASYNC requests inline when a handoff is possible Jens Axboe
2026-09-11 17:33 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] io_uring: thread identity handoff for blocking inline issue Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2026-09-11 17:51 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911154148.644489-7-axboe@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.