From: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
Cc: "Donggeun Yoo" <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
"Luben Tuikov" <ltuikov89@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sched: Free the run queues at the end of drm_sched_fini()
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 09:38:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260912003805.1900119-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910123736.6EB8D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
On 9/10/26 21:37, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> [Critical] Potential Use-After-Free of `sched` and `sched->sched_rq` if
> `drm_sched_fini()` is called with pending jobs and `own_submit_wq` is false.
The chain is there in the scheduler. drm_sched_start() queues work_run_job
unconditionally, and drm_sched_fini() destroys submit_wq only when it owns it,
so a timeout handler restarting the scheduler during teardown could leave work
behind that later reads sched->sched_rq[i].
No in-tree driver reaches it. Of the four that pass their own submit_wq:
- panthor sets .timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT on both its schedulers, which
drm_sched_start_timeout() tests before anything else, so the TDR never arms;
- powervr refcounts the context, and pvr_queue_destroy() runs only after the
last reference is dropped, which in-flight jobs hold;
- nouveau waits on nouveau_sched_job_list_empty() before drm_sched_fini();
- xe never calls drm_sched_start().
Both drivers named in the report are covered, for different reasons. So there
is nothing here for this patch, which only moves the run queue frees within
drm_sched_fini().
The one thing worth recording is that the protection is per-driver rather than
structural. A driver combining its own submit_wq, a finite timeout, and
drm_sched_start() in timedout_job would have to drain before teardown itself.
Regards,
Donggeun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-12 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 12:16 [PATCH] drm/sched: Free the run queues at the end of drm_sched_fini() Donggeun Yoo
2026-09-10 12:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12 0:38 ` Donggeun Yoo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260912003805.1900119-1-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com \
--to=donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltuikov89@gmail.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.