All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiaxing Hu" <gahing@gahingwoo.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/14] accel/rocket: request the core clocks by name
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 07:03:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260912070321.696351F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912065053.1519165-2-gahing@gahingwoo.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Probe deferral, missing clocks, or device unbind leaks devres allocations attached to the global `drm_dev`.
- [High] Incorrect core tracking logic in `rocket_remove` and `rocket_probe` causes active cores to be orphaned, unreachable, or silently overwritten upon partial unbind.
--

commit 4baecbc1d36cdb2c0321f080e879383800570708
Author: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>

accel/rocket: request the core clocks by name

This patch fixes an issue where the NPU driver failed to set the .id members
of its clk_bulk_data struct before requesting them. Without IDs, clk_bulk_get
defaulted to returning the first clock in the device tree for all entries. The
clocks are now properly requested by name as required by the DT binding.

> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> index b3b2fa9ba645a..5dd260bacbff6 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ int rocket_core_init(struct rocket_core *core)
>  	if (err)
>  		return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to get resets for core %d\n", core->index);
>  
> +	core->clks[0].id = "aclk";
> +	core->clks[1].id = "hclk";
> +	core->clks[2].id = "npu";
> +	core->clks[3].id = "pclk";
>  	err = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(core->clks), core->clks);
>  	if (err)
>  		return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to get clocks for core %d\n", core->index);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this failure path cause an unbounded
resource leak if devm_clk_bulk_get() defers probe or fails?

If rocket_core_init() fails here, rocket_probe() cleans up by calling
rocket_device_fini() and setting the global rdev pointer to NULL:

drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c:rocket_probe() {
    ...
	ret = rocket_core_init(&rdev->cores[core]);
	if (ret) {
		rdev->num_cores--;

		if (rdev->num_cores == 0) {
			rocket_device_fini(rdev);
			rdev = NULL;
		}
	}
    ...
}

However, rdev and its cores array are allocated in rocket_device_init() using
devm_* functions attached to drm_dev, which is a static global device:

drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c:rocket_device_init() {
    ...
	rdev = devm_drm_dev_alloc(dev, rocket_drm_driver, struct rocket_device, ddev);
    ...
	rdev->cores = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_cores, sizeof(*rdev->cores), GFP_KERNEL);
    ...
}

Because drm_dev is global and persists across probe deferrals, its devres
list is never cleared. When rocket_probe() executes again, a new rdev is
allocated on the same global device, permanently leaking the previous one.

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but if this failure path is hit (or if a
core is unbound via sysfs), does the core tracking logic in rocket_remove()
and rocket_probe() orphan the remaining active cores?

If a core other than the most-recently-probed one fails or unbinds,
rocket_remove() blindly decrements rdev->num_cores:

drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c:rocket_remove() {
    ...
	rocket_core_fini(&rdev->cores[core]);
	rdev->num_cores--;
    ...
}

Without shifting array elements to compact the list, active cores located
past the shrunken num_cores boundary can no longer be found for teardown or
power management:

drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c:find_core_for_dev() {
    ...
	for (unsigned int core = 0; core < rdev->num_cores; core++) {
		if (dev == rdev->cores[core].dev)
			return core;
	}
    ...
}

This could cause power management callbacks to fail with -ENODEV while the
hardware is still running. Furthermore, if a new core binds later,
rocket_probe() will insert it at rdev->num_cores, which could silently
overwrite the live context of the stranded core.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260912065053.1519165-1-gahing@gahingwoo.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-12  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-12  6:50 [PATCH v12 00/14] accel/rocket: RK3576 NPU (RKNN) enablement Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 01/14] accel/rocket: request the core clocks by name Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  7:03   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 02/14] accel/rocket: take the completion register writes under job_lock Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  7:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 03/14] accel/rocket: wait for a running IRQ handler before resetting a core Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  7:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12 11:37   ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-12 11:37     ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-12 22:48     ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12 22:48       ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-13  0:13       ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-13  0:13         ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 04/14] accel/rocket: let the core suspend after a reset Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  7:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 05/14] accel/rocket: factor the completion tail out of the IRQ handler Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  7:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 06/14] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip, rk3576-rknn-core Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` [PATCH v12 06/14] dt-bindings: npu: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3576-rknn-core Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 07/14] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: allow resets in a power domain node Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 08/14] dt-bindings: iommu: rockchip: describe the RK3576 NPU MMU Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  7:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 09/14] pmdomain: rockchip: add optional per-domain power-on settle delay Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  7:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 10/14] pmdomain: rockchip: cycle optional power-domain resets on power-on Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  7:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 11/14] accel/rocket: select the per-core clock and reset counts from match data Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  7:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 12/14] accel/rocket: add RK3576 NPU (RKNN) support Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  7:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 13/14] arm64: dts: rockchip: add NPU (RKNN) nodes to rk3576 Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50 ` [PATCH v12 14/14] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable the NPU on rk3576-rock-4d Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-12  6:50   ` Jiaxing Hu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260912070321.696351F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.