From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aldo Ariel Panzardo" <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/qxl: validate relocation dst_offset against destination BO
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:44:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260913224435.750671F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260913223000.695299-2-qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] The patch fails to prevent out-of-bounds writes for system RAM BOs (dumb buffers) due to a preexisting flaw in qxl_bo_kmap_atomic_page's fallback branch.
--
commit 816a48396f060545d332f11cc2d661437076fb2f
Author: Aldo Ariel Panzardo <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
drm/qxl: validate relocation dst_offset against destination BO
This patch attempts to prevent out-of-bounds writes during relocation
processing by validating that the user-provided dst_offset falls within
the destination buffer object. It adds bounds checks for both the
command/release BO and general relocation destination BOs.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c
> index 591b026ceff9c..e727a35c94136 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ioctl.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -227,10 +231,22 @@ static int qxl_process_single_command(struct qxl_device *qdev,
> goto out_free_bos;
> reloc_info[i].dst_offset = reloc.dst_offset;
> } else {
[ ... ]
> reloc_info[i].dst_bo = cmd_bo;
> reloc_info[i].dst_offset = reloc.dst_offset + release->release_offset;
> }
>
> + if ((u64)reloc_info[i].dst_offset + write_size >
> + reloc_info[i].dst_bo->tbo.base.size) {
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this newly added bounds check fully
prevent out-of-bounds writes for system RAM BOs (dumb buffers)?
The new bounds check in qxl_process_single_command verifies that dst_offset
is within the BO size. However, it relies on the un-multiplied byte offset.
Later, apply_reloc calls qxl_bo_kmap_atomic_page, passing
dst_offset & PAGE_MASK as the page_offset argument.
If a user creates a dumb buffer (placed in TTM_PL_SYSTEM) and passes its
handle with a large dst_offset, qxl_bo_kmap_atomic_page in
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c takes a fallback branch. That fallback
branch contains the following pointer calculation:
rptr += page_offset * PAGE_SIZE;
Because page_offset is derived from a byte offset, multiplying it by
PAGE_SIZE creates a massive out-of-bounds pointer calculation (for example,
a 100MB offset becomes 400GB). Since the QXL_EXECBUFFER ioctl is accessible
to any authenticated DRM client, an unprivileged user could use this path to
write a 64-bit physical address or 32-bit surface ID into kernel memory,
which can lead to system compromise or a kernel panic.
Should the underlying multiplier bug in qxl_bo_kmap_atomic_page be addressed
alongside this patch to ensure the vulnerability is fully closed?
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_free_bos;
> + }
> +
> /* reserve and validate the reloc dst bo */
> if (reloc.reloc_type == QXL_RELOC_TYPE_BO || reloc.src_handle) {
> ret = qxlhw_handle_to_bo(file_priv, reloc.src_handle, release,
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260913223000.695299-1-qwe.aldo@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-13 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-13 22:29 [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/qxl: fix multiple missing bounds checks in execbuffer relocations Aldo Ariel Panzardo
2026-09-13 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/qxl: validate relocation dst_offset against destination BO Aldo Ariel Panzardo
2026-09-13 22:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-13 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/qxl: reject command sizes that exceed the release slot Aldo Ariel Panzardo
2026-09-13 22:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/qxl: reject relocations whose writes cross a page boundary Aldo Ariel Panzardo
2026-09-13 22:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-13 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/qxl: validate relocation src_offset and fix type truncation Aldo Ariel Panzardo
2026-09-13 22:46 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260913224435.750671F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=qwe.aldo@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.