From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA0EF41F7FD; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789378711; cv=none; b=SfAu0qlZ8JmpAMheWLtR7B+EdJUxOKXI+50OGQsrQrBrbkJZiS5A0xtH+HKKSuH3h6yv4qlyI7eAhUuYmUXZePDltwOgA+GerPCksprCU7THKyuwFzhGJW4ZNhVnx13i3z+YCz1oa9qW8ghV6tIrQot6II6ZE6vZd0eYu9R8vCM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789378711; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kS/fhl7f3dND0iPGjp2SusrWniYn7mPeLl9xjmSREwA=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=dffzB45Lpq3MWu7MHnaxVCOi572ZOVIP6TgNzFFZPnoXc2jSKcWV49E/+/mTUzn9JfjGvjKk5qYP/Xp7NdNXx5AE69V94Oz1sIZzXyZIIy5EZMlbJSUX9Ai7uawml5rAwudBvSoXlXQeVPxS0khQdl/jOfPr6+UNCFDNU9iN1WY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VNmkMgzN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VNmkMgzN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 361641F000FF; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:38:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789378709; bh=kS/fhl7f3dND0iPGjp2SusrWniYn7mPeLl9xjmSREwA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=VNmkMgzNq47bs7NsDj2vhFtP7YynPfA0FUnIkd4ytg3mikHf1jYZLvWDuM064Rou2 NvOVSgy6vR8wk9peR6pg4Jxd4YmRoGB0pkHwrlzBuBhE1qVQKw/83k1kyVMHN1wJ0p ovcKiNqv1l3D7KvkhVJLNj/Ach5fFfbULPr2O+5vo0/+osyCLs+YVSF9m+LtJevDcH 8qGP5xxCQmcikuwmI9/FzdU2vJ9ubPIaXFjSGaiJG6BK/pPRlLm1DuhURIA308oCge MyIo6Ye9bmN0SfP0Begh7xRSzL1s1KCKIWxnbjyp7WgoJyQgO4jOA4tki32TpzvYue yg7THCoivpfjw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] selftests/livepatch: Add RISC-V syscall wrapper prefix Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Shuai Xue" Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260914092648.51254-8-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20260914092648.51254-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> <20260914092648.51254-8-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:38:28 +0000 Message-Id: <20260914093829.361641F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Wang Han >=20 > The syscall livepatch selftest resolves and patches a syscall wrapper > symbol. To use that test for RISC-V livepatch validation, add the > RISC-V FN_PREFIX definition for ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER. >=20 > Without this macro, the syscall livepatch selftest cannot resolve the > RISC-V target symbol, and the syscall-related livepatch test fails on > RISC-V. >=20 > Reviewed-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza > Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue > Acked-by: Miroslav Benes > Assisted-by: Qoder:Qwen-3.8-MAX-Preview > Signed-off-by: Wang Han > Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260914092648.5125= 4-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com?part=3D7