All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Allison Henderson" <achender@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 13/13] net/rds: hold a connection reference from struct rds_incoming
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 03:37:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260915033741.9455C1F00899@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914033719.138057-14-achender@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Race condition in `rds_send_probe()` can leak `rds_message` and connection reference during connection teardown.
--

commit 9f78a5cbb0d8c28990a439e07491dbc084983be8
Author: Sharath Srinivasan <sharath.srinivasan@oracle.com>

net/rds: hold a connection reference from struct rds_incoming

This commit ensures that every holder of rds_incoming->i_conn takes a
reference to the connection. This prevents a use-after-free when the
connection is destroyed by device removal or module unload while messages
are still queued on the socket.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260720184955.3008978-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com/

> diff --git a/net/rds/send.c b/net/rds/send.c
> index 94d6ac174dde8..f59a487b079d5 100644
> --- a/net/rds/send.c
> +++ b/net/rds/send.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1577,6 +1580,7 @@ rds_send_probe(struct rds_conn_path *cp, __be16 sport,
>  	list_add_tail(&rm->m_conn_item, &cp->cp_send_queue);
>  	set_bit(RDS_MSG_ON_CONN, &rm->m_flags);
>  	rds_message_addref(rm);
> +	rds_conn_get(cp->cp_conn);	/* put in rds_message_put() */

[Severity: High]
Does this code allow a message and connection reference to be permanently
leaked during connection teardown?

In rds_send_queue_rm(), rds_destroy_pending() is checked while holding
cp->cp_lock before queueing a message. However, here in rds_send_probe(), the
message is added to the send queue and the connection reference is taken
without first checking rds_destroy_pending() under the lock.

If a concurrent network namespace teardown or module unload initiates
rds_conn_destroy(), it calls rds_conn_path_quiesce() which purges the
cp_send_queue under cp_lock. This probe message can then be inserted into
the queue right after the purge.

After releasing the lock, rds_send_probe() checks rds_destroy_pending()
outside the lock to decide whether to queue the worker:

	rcu_read_lock();
	if (!rds_destroy_pending(cp->cp_conn))
		queue_delayed_work(cp->cp_wq, &cp->cp_send_w, 1);
	rcu_read_unlock();

If the teardown race described above occurs, rds_destroy_pending() will
evaluate to true here, and the worker will not be queued.

Since the message was already added to the purged cp_send_queue and the
worker is skipped, is the message left stranded indefinitely? This would
cause the connection reference to never be dropped, leading to an indefinite
hang during transport module unload, as rds_conn_wait_conns_freed() waits
forever for the connection count to reach zero.

>  	rm->m_inc.i_conn = cp->cp_conn;
>  	rm->m_inc.i_conn_path = cp;
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260914033719.138057-1-achender@kernel.org?part=13

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-15  3:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-14  3:37 [PATCH net-next v3 00/13] net/rds: make connection lifetime reference-counted Allison Henderson
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/13] net/rds: ib: don't enable interrupts in rds_ib_conn_free() Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/13] net/rds: free every path's transport data on the passive create paths Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/13] net/rds: guard every work-requeueing site with rds_destroy_pending() Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/13] net/rds: make rds_destroy_pending() cover single-connection destroy Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/13] net/rds: split connection destroy into quiesce and kref-governed free Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/13] net/rds: wait for connections to be freed on transport unload Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/13] net/rds: unlink transport nodes before a possibly deferred connection free Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/13] net/rds: hold connection references in lookup, sockets and c_passive Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/13] net/rds: refuse to queue a message on a connection being destroyed Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/13] net/rds: tcp: don't attach an accepted socket to " Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 11/13] net/rds: pin the connection across RDMA-CM event handling Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 12/13] net/rds: drop rds_conn_count in favor of t_conn_count Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-14  3:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 13/13] net/rds: hold a connection reference from struct rds_incoming Allison Henderson
2026-09-15  3:37   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-17  9:38   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260915033741.9455C1F00899@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=achender@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.